These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23014704)
1. Realities of biomedical product liability suits and the role of junk science: from breast implants to TASER weapons. Kroll M IEEE Pulse; 2012; 3(5):27-32. PubMed ID: 23014704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patent issue: supplier liability in medical implants and devices: the "Biomaterials Access Assurance Act". Pabst PL; Mills KV Tissue Eng; 2000 Apr; 6(2):189-90. PubMed ID: 10941213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The war against junk science: the use of expert panels in complex medical-legal scientific litigation. Price JM; Rosenberg ES Biomaterials; 1998 Aug; 19(16):1425-32. PubMed ID: 9794513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court rules on medical device liability--or does it? Richards EP IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1997; 16(1):87-8, 90. PubMed ID: 9058587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Junk science v. American competitiveness. Szycher M J Biomater Appl; 1993 Jul; 8(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 8345448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal suits: pharmaceutical industry strategies to introduce new drugs in the Brazilian public healthcare system. Chieffi AL; Barata Rde C Rev Saude Publica; 2010 Jun; 44(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 20549017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What a presidential report means for device manufacturers. Badelt SW Biomed Instrum Technol; 2014; Suppl():52, 54, 56. PubMed ID: 25244338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Theories of recovery for DES damage. Is tort liability the answer? Downey AH; Gulley KG J Leg Med; 1983 Jun; 4(2):167-200. PubMed ID: 6604118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guide to preemption of state-law claims against Class III PMA medical devices. Whitney DW Food Drug Law J; 2010; 65(1):113-39, ii-iii. PubMed ID: 24475536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Permitting product liability litigation for FDA-approved drugs and devices promotes patient safety. Kesselheim AS Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Jun; 87(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 20485322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Silicone breast implants. Can emerging medical, legal, and scientific concepts be reconciled? Snyder JW J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):133-220. PubMed ID: 9230567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Working draft of the FDA GMP final rule (Part I). Donawa ME Med Device Technol; 1995 Oct; 6(8):13-22. PubMed ID: 10158125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomaterials science at a crossroads: are current product liability laws in the United States hampering innovation and the development of safer medical implants? Kohn J Pharm Res; 1996 Jun; 13(6):815-9. PubMed ID: 8792416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Innovation and change in medical technology: interactions between physicians and engineers. Piehler HR J Invest Surg; 1992; 5(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1390460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The medical malpractice crisis: what is the cause? Is there a cure? Cascardo D J Med Pract Manage; 2007; 22(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 17494485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]