265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23016568)
1. Comparative effectiveness of pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and sargramostim prophylaxis for neutropenia-related hospitalization: two US retrospective claims analyses.
Henk HJ; Becker L; Tan H; Yu J; Kavati A; Naeim A; Deeter R; Barron R
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 23016568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative effectiveness of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim as prophylaxis against hospitalization for neutropenic complications in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Weycker D; Malin J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
Am J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 21378538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).
Naeim A; Henk HJ; Becker L; Chia V; Badre S; Li X; Deeter R
BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 23298389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk of hospitalization for neutropenic complications of chemotherapy in patients with primary solid tumors receiving pegfilgrastim or filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective cohort study.
Weycker D; Malin J; Kim J; Barron R; Edelsberg J; Kartashov A; Oster G
Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1069-81. PubMed ID: 19539108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of hospitalization risk and associated costs among patients receiving sargramostim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Heaney ML; Toy EL; Vekeman F; Laliberté F; Dority BL; Perlman D; Barghout V; Duh MS
Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(20):4839-48. PubMed ID: 19637341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective study of patients' out-of-pocket costs for granulocyte colony-stimulating factors.
Tomic K; Long S; Li X; Fu AC; Yu TC; Barron R
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2013 Dec; 19(4):328-37. PubMed ID: 23353712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are shorter courses of filgrastim prophylaxis associated with increased risk of hospitalization?
Weycker D; Hackett J; Edelsberg JS; Oster G; Glass AG
Ann Pharmacother; 2006 Mar; 40(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 16492793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients.
Lathia N; Isogai PK; De Angelis C; Smith TJ; Cheung M; Mittmann N; Hoch JS; Walker S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Aug; 105(15):1078-85. PubMed ID: 23873405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States.
Lyman GH; Lalla A; Barron RL; Dubois RW
Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effectiveness of primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer at risk of febrile neutropenia.
Aarts MJ; Grutters JP; Peters FP; Mandigers CM; Dercksen MW; Stouthard JM; Nortier HJ; van Laarhoven HW; van Warmerdam LJ; van de Wouw AJ; Jacobs EM; Mattijssen V; van der Rijt CC; Smilde TJ; van der Velden AW; Temizkan M; Batman E; Muller EW; van Gastel SM; Joore MA; Borm GF; Tjan-Heijnen VC
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 31(34):4283-9. PubMed ID: 24166522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of primary prophylaxis on febrile neutropenia within community practices in the US.
Hershman D; Hurley D; Wong M; Morrison VA; Malin JL
J Med Econ; 2009 Sep; 12(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 19723018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany].
Sehouli J; Goertz A; Steinle T; Dubois R; Plesnila-Frank C; Lalla A; von Minckwitz G
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 20180162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma--a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Numnum TM; Kimball KJ; Rocconi RP; Kilgore LC; Straughn JM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17386043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of a formulary change from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on outcomes in patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Wong SF; Chan HO
Pharmacotherapy; 2005 Mar; 25(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 15843284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective comparison of neutropenia in children with Ewing sarcoma treated with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or pegylated G-CSF.
Milano-Bausset E; Gaudart J; Rome A; Coze C; Gentet JC; Padovani L; Lacarelle B; André N
Clin Ther; 2009; 31 Pt 2():2388-95. PubMed ID: 20110048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from an integrated analysis.
Pettengell R; Schwenkglenks M; Bacon P; Lawrinson S; Duehrsen U
Hematol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 29(4):177-84. PubMed ID: 21246591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neutropenia-associated outcomes in adults with acute myeloid leukemia receiving cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Bradley AM; Deal AM; Buie LW; van Deventer H
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Dec; 32(12):1070-7. PubMed ID: 23208834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
