These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23016847)

  • 61. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Rationalizing tight ligand binding through cooperative interaction networks.
    Kuhn B; Fuchs JE; Reutlinger M; Stahl M; Taylor NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Dec; 51(12):3180-98. PubMed ID: 22087588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparing sixteen scoring functions for predicting biological activities of ligands for protein targets.
    Xu W; Lucke AJ; Fairlie DP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Apr; 57():76-88. PubMed ID: 25682361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.
    Lu J; Hou X; Wang C; Zhang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4540-4549. PubMed ID: 31638801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Evaluation of Protein-Ligand Docking by Cyscore.
    Cao Y; Dai W; Miao Z
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():233-243. PubMed ID: 29594775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Electrostatic Energy in Protein-Ligand Complexes.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():67-77. PubMed ID: 31452099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using multiple instance learning.
    Teramoto R; Kashima H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Nov; 29(3):492-7. PubMed ID: 20965757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Optimizing the affinity and specificity of ligand binding with the inclusion of solvation effect.
    Yan Z; Wang J
    Proteins; 2015 Sep; 83(9):1632-42. PubMed ID: 26111900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Detecting drug promiscuity using Gaussian ensemble screening.
    Pérez-Nueno VI; Venkatraman V; Mavridis L; Ritchie DW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):1948-61. PubMed ID: 22747187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Improving performance of docking-based virtual screening by structural filtration.
    Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Stroganov OV; Chilov GG
    J Mol Model; 2010 Jul; 16(7):1223-30. PubMed ID: 20041273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Facing the challenges of structure-based target prediction by inverse virtual screening.
    Schomburg KT; Bietz S; Briem H; Henzler AM; Urbaczek S; Rarey M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1676-86. PubMed ID: 24851945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Electrostatic Potential Energy in Protein-Drug Complexes.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo Junior WF
    Curr Med Chem; 2021; 28(24):4954-4971. PubMed ID: 33593246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Logistic Regression Method for Ligand Discovery.
    Chen C; Wang H
    J Comput Biol; 2020 Jun; 27(6):934-940. PubMed ID: 31545095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Consensus scoring approach to identify the inhibitors of AMP-activated protein kinase α2 with virtual screening.
    Park H; Eom JW; Kim YH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2139-46. PubMed ID: 24915156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Knowledge-based scoring functions in drug design: 2. Can the knowledge base be enriched?
    Shen Q; Xiong B; Zheng M; Luo X; Luo C; Liu X; Du Y; Li J; Zhu W; Shen J; Jiang H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):386-97. PubMed ID: 21192670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking.
    Ballester PJ; Mitchell JB
    Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 26(9):1169-75. PubMed ID: 20236947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Poses via a Combination of Induced Fit Docking and Metadynamics Simulations.
    Clark AJ; Tiwary P; Borrelli K; Feng S; Miller EB; Abel R; Friesner RA; Berne BJ
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jun; 12(6):2990-8. PubMed ID: 27145262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Cross-docking benchmark for automated pose and ranking prediction of ligand binding.
    Wierbowski SD; Wingert BM; Zheng J; Camacho CJ
    Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):298-305. PubMed ID: 31721338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.