These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23017633)

  • 1. A framework for understanding cancer comparative effectiveness research data needs.
    Carpenter WR; Meyer AM; Abernethy AP; Stürmer T; Kosorok MR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1150-8. PubMed ID: 23017633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Building sustainable multi-functional prospective electronic clinical data systems.
    Randhawa GS; Slutsky JR
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S3-6. PubMed ID: 22692255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epidemiologic and statistical methods for comparative effectiveness research.
    Hlatky MA; Winkelmayer WC; Setoguchi S
    Heart Fail Clin; 2013 Jan; 9(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 23168315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement.
    Franklin PD; Allison JJ; Ayers DC
    JAMA; 2012 Sep; 308(12):1217-8. PubMed ID: 23011710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measure once, cut twice--adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research.
    Wu AW; Kharrazi H; Boulware LE; Snyder CF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S12-20. PubMed ID: 23849145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.
    Berger ML; Mamdani M; Atkins D; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1044-52. PubMed ID: 19793072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.
    Fischer MA; Allen-Coleman C; Farrell SF; Schneeweiss S
    J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26388438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative effectiveness research (CER): a summary of AHRQ's CER on therapies for rheumatoid arthritis.
    Oderda GM; Balfe LM
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl B):S19-24. PubMed ID: 22073936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenges encountered in the conduct of Optimal Health: A patient-centered comparative effectiveness study of interventions for adults with serious mental illness.
    Kogan JN; Schuster J; Nikolajski C; Schake P; Carney T; Morton SC; Kang C; Reynolds CF
    Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 27681658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness research methods: symposium overview and summary.
    Lohr KN
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S3-6. PubMed ID: 20473188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Priorities for comparative effectiveness reviews in cardiovascular disease.
    Eapen ZJ; McBroom AJ; Gray R; Musty MD; Hadley C; Hernandez AF; Sanders GD
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2013 Mar; 6(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 23481525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network.
    Devine EB; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Devlin A; Edwards TC; Farrokhi ET; Kessler L; Lavallee DC; Patrick DL; Sullivan SD; Tarczy-Hornoch P; Yanez ND; Flum DR;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S122-9. PubMed ID: 23849146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
    Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A call for action: Comparative effectiveness research in asthma.
    Krishnan JA; Schatz M; Apter AJ
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2011 Jan; 127(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 20855111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can CER be an effective tool for change in the development and assessment of new drugs and technologies?
    Brixner DI; Watkins JB
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2012 Jun; 18(5 Supp A):S06-11. PubMed ID: 22663293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Norris SL; Atkins D; Bruening W; Fox S; Johnson E; Kane R; Morton SC; Oremus M; Ospina M; Randhawa G; Schoelles K; Shekelle P; Viswanathan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.