These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

33 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23017758)

  • 1. On Playing with Emotion: A Spatial Evolutionary Variation of the Ultimatum Game.
    Charcon DY; Monteiro LHA
    Entropy (Basel); 2024 Feb; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 38539716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radical framing effects in the ultimatum game: the impact of explicit culturally transmitted frames on economic decision-making.
    Lightner AD; Barclay P; Hagen EH
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Dec; 4(12):170543. PubMed ID: 29308218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When More Is Better - Consumption Priming Decreases Responders' Rejections in the Ultimatum Game.
    Zürn M; Strack F
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2226. PubMed ID: 29326637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of self-interest in elite bargaining.
    LeVeck BL; Hughes DA; Fowler JH; Hafner-Burton E; Victor DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(52):18536-41. PubMed ID: 25512497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Both Rewards and Moral Praise Can Increase the Prosocial Decisions: Revealed in a Modified Ultimatum Game Task.
    Wang X; Han J; Li F; Cao B
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1865. PubMed ID: 30337899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective Physiological Measurements but Not Subjective Reports Moderate the Effect of Hunger on Choice Behavior.
    Shabat-Simon M; Shuster A; Sela T; Levy DJ
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():750. PubMed ID: 29875715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A replication of extended implementation and social interaction during the Step it UP! Game for adults with disabilities.
    Seward R; Redner R
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38963347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Author Correction: Testosterone promotes either dominance or submissiveness in the Ultimatum Game depending on players' social rank.
    Inoue Y; Takahashi T; Burriss RP; Arai S; Hasegawa T; Yamagishi T; Kiyonari T
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20363. PubMed ID: 37989842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The waiting game.
    Rastogi A
    Nat Comput Sci; 2023 Oct; 3(10):817. PubMed ID: 38177770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Lesson from "The Brodie Ultimatum": The Locus of Control for Epilepsy is Outside the Therapeutic Alliance.
    Harden C
    Epilepsy Curr; 2013 Jan; 13(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 23447731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enforcement of Fairness Norms by Punishment: A Comparison of Gains and Losses.
    Windrich I; Kierspel S; Neumann T; Berger R; Vogt B
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2024 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38247691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experiments on norm focusing and losses in dictator games.
    Windrich I; Kierspel S; Neumann T; Berger R; Vogt B
    Front Sociol; 2022; 7():930976. PubMed ID: 36091094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses.
    Gaertner W; Bradley R; Xu Y; Schwettmann L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0218805. PubMed ID: 31329613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cooperative Behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Prisoner's Dilemma Depends on Players' Contributions.
    Bland AR; Roiser JP; Mehta MA; Schei T; Sahakian BJ; Robbins TW; Elliott R
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1017. PubMed ID: 28670295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of decision making after unfair treatment.
    Wu Y; Zang Y; Yuan B; Tian X
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():123. PubMed ID: 25798102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditions for the emergence of shared norms in populations with incompatible preferences.
    Helbing D; Yu W; Opp KD; Rauhut H
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104207. PubMed ID: 25166137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power and fairness in a generalized ultimatum game.
    Ciampaglia GL; Lozano S; Helbing D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99039. PubMed ID: 24905349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bargaining over waiting time in ultimatum game experiments.
    Berger R; Rauhut H; Prade S; Helbing D
    Soc Sci Res; 2012 Mar; 41(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 23017758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do people reject unintended inequity? Responders' rejection in a truncated ultimatum game.
    Ohmura Y; Yamagishi T
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Apr; 96(2):533-41. PubMed ID: 15941131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.