132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23017821)
1. Interaction of epithelial biomarkers, local immune response and condom use in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3 regression.
Munk AC; Gudlaugsson E; Ovestad IT; Lovslett K; Fiane B; Hidle Bv; Kruse AJ; Skaland I; Janssen EA; Baak JP
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Dec; 127(3):489-94. PubMed ID: 23017821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of epithelial biomarkers, local immune response and human papillomavirus genotype in the regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3.
Ovestad IT; Gudlaugsson E; Skaland I; Malpica A; Munk AC; Janssen EA; Baak JP
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Apr; 64(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 21421698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Consistent condom use increases the regression rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2-3.
Munk AC; Gudlaugsson E; Malpica A; Fiane B; Løvslett KI; Kruse AJ; Øvestad IT; Voorhorst F; Janssen EA; Baak JP
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45114. PubMed ID: 23028792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human papilloma virus testing in patient follow-up post cone biopsy due to high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Almog B; Gamzu R; Kuperminc MJ; Levin I; Fainaru O; Niv J; Bar-Am A
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Mar; 88(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 12648585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. p16INK4A immunohistochemical staining and predictive value for progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1: a prospective study in China.
Liao GD; Sellors JW; Sun HK; Zhang X; Bao YP; Jeronimo J; Chen W; Zhao FH; Song Y; Cao Z; Zhang SK; Xi MR; Qiao YL
Int J Cancer; 2014 Apr; 134(7):1715-24. PubMed ID: 24105727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local immune response in the microenvironment of CIN2-3 with and without spontaneous regression.
Øvestad IT; Gudlaugsson E; Skaland I; Malpica A; Kruse AJ; Janssen EA; Baak JP
Mod Pathol; 2010 Sep; 23(9):1231-40. PubMed ID: 20512116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low- and high-risk CIN 1 and 2 lesions: prospective predictive value of grade, HPV, and Ki-67 immuno-quantitative variables.
Kruse AJ; Baak JP; Janssen EA; Bol MG; Kjellevold KH; Fianne B; Lovslett K; Bergh J
J Pathol; 2003 Apr; 199(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 12635137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 lesions can regress.
Munk AC; Kruse AJ; van Diermen B; Janssen EA; Skaland I; Gudlaugsson E; Nilsen ST; Baak JP
APMIS; 2007 Dec; 115(12):1409-14. PubMed ID: 18184413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human papillomavirus viral load in predicting high-grade CIN in women with cervical smears showing only atypical squamous cells or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Santos AL; Derchain SF; Martins MR; Sarian LO; Martinez EZ; Syrjänen KJ
Sao Paulo Med J; 2003 Nov; 121(6):238-43. PubMed ID: 14989139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Six-year regression and progression of cervical lesions of different human papillomavirus viral loads in varied histological diagnoses.
Wang SM; Colombara D; Shi JF; Zhao FH; Li J; Chen F; Chen W; Li SM; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Belinson JL; Smith JS; Qiao YL
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 May; 23(4):716-23. PubMed ID: 23455757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Staining in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 Biopsies as Biomarkers for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3 in Cone Results.
Miralpeix E; Solé-Sedeño JM; Mancebo G; Lloveras B; Bellosillo B; Carreras R; Alameda F
Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol; 2016 Feb; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 27363060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcome of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy: A 10-year experience.
Hong DK; Kim SA; Lim KT; Lee KH; Kim TJ; So KA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May; 236():173-176. PubMed ID: 30933887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Regression of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with HLA-DRB1*13 genotype.
Sastre-Garau X; Cartier I; Jourdan-Da Silva N; De Crémoux P; Lepage V; Charron D
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 104(4):751-5. PubMed ID: 15458897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Colposcopic biopsies versus loop electrosurgical excision procedure cone histology in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women.
Del Priore G; Gilmore PR; Maag T; Warshal DP; Cheon TH
J Reprod Med; 1996 Sep; 41(9):653-7. PubMed ID: 8887189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship of human papillomavirus infection with endocervical glandular involvement on cone specimens in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Spinillo A; Dominoni M; Boschi AC; Cesari S; Fiandrino G; Gardella B
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):630-635. PubMed ID: 33041069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Condom use to enhance regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Skorstengaard M; Suhr J; Lynge E
Trials; 2019 Aug; 20(1):473. PubMed ID: 31375148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
