150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23018300)
1. Comparison of standard 4-row versus 6-row3-D linear cutter stapler in creation of gastrointestinal system anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial.
Sozutek A; Colak T; Dag A; Olmez T
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2012 Sep; 67(9):1035-8. PubMed ID: 23018300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective trial evaluating new circular and linear stapler devices for gastrointestinal anastomosis: preliminary data.
De Nardi P; Panzeri F; Staudacher C
Tech Coloproctol; 2008 Mar; 12(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 18512017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical application of biofragmentable anastomosis ring for intestinal anastomosis].
Ye F; Lin JJ
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 Nov; 35(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 17177342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intestinal anastomosis by use of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring: is it safe and efficacious in emergency operations as well?
Choi HJ; Kim HH; Jung GJ; Kim SS
Dis Colon Rectum; 1998 Oct; 41(10):1281-6. PubMed ID: 9788392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stapled versus sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the trauma patient.
Brundage SI; Jurkovich GJ; Grossman DC; Tong WC; Mack CD; Maier RV
J Trauma; 1999 Sep; 47(3):500-7; discussion 507-8. PubMed ID: 10498304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stapled bowel anastomoses in newborn surgery.
Kozlov Y; Novogilov V; Podkamenev A; Weber I
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Feb; 23(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 23100058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Curved cutter stapler vs. linear stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a pilot prospective randomized study.
Lee WS; Lee WY; Chun HK; Yun SH; Cho YB; Yun HR
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2009 Nov; 24(11):1327-32. PubMed ID: 19641928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Efficacy analysis of laparoscopic curve resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Li M; Shen J; Du Y; Xie D; Qu H; Zhang Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 19(11):1296-1299. PubMed ID: 27928803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with linear cutter technique: comparison of four-row versus six-row cartridge in creation of anastomosis.
Szomstein S; Whipple OC; Zundel N; Cal P; Rosenthal R
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2006; 2(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 16925374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome.
Pines G; Buyeviz V; Machlenkin S; Klein Y; Laor A; Kashtan H
Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 19431220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie A; Fitzgerald A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD004320. PubMed ID: 21901690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experiences with the linear cutter technique for performing Roux-en-Y anastomosis following total gastrectomy.
Shoji Y; Nihei Z; Hirayama R; Mishima Y
Surg Today; 1995; 25(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 7749286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized trial on the application of biofragmentable anastomosis ring in intestinal anastomosis.
Chen S; Yang B; He JH; Zhang YC; Lai DM
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Aug; 122(15):1755-8. PubMed ID: 19781320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The biofragmentable ring in intestinal surgery.
Gullichsen R
Eur J Surg Suppl; 1993; (569):1-31. PubMed ID: 7683222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does advancement in stapling technology with triple-row and enhanced staple configurations confer additional safety? A matched comparison of 340 stapled ileocolic anastomoses.
Foo CC; Chiu AHO; Yip J; Law WL
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3122-3130. PubMed ID: 29340808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and stapled anastomoses in the extraperitoneal rectum: a prospective, randomized study.
Galizia G; Lieto E; Castellano P; Pelosio L; Imperatore V; Canfora F; Pignatelli C
Int J Colorectal Dis; 1999 Dec; 14(6):286-90. PubMed ID: 10663896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stapled intestinal anastomosis in neonates: validation of safety and efficacy.
Simmons JD; Gunter JW; Manley JD; Sawaya DE; Blewett CJ
Am Surg; 2010 Jun; 76(6):644-6. PubMed ID: 20583524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie AE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004320. PubMed ID: 17636751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preventing complications in colorectal anastomosis: results of a randomized controlled trial using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler.
Placer C; Enríquez-Navascués JM; Elorza G; Timoteo A; Mugica JA; Borda N; Saralegui Y; Elósegui JL
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Oct; 57(10):1195-201. PubMed ID: 25203376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
