These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2301880)
1. Evaluation of porous polyethylene for external ear reconstruction. Shanbhag A; Friedman HI; Augustine J; von Recum AF Ann Plast Surg; 1990 Jan; 24(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 2301880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant. Wellisz T Aesthetic Plast Surg; 1993; 17(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 8273538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and histologic behavior of exposed porous high-density polyethylene implants. Sclafani AP; Romo T; Silver L Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jan; 99(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 8982185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of experimental porous silicone implants and porous silicone implants. Son J; Kim CS; Yang J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 250(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 22202952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of Gore-Tex E-PTFE bonded to silicone rubber as an alloplastic implant material. Berman M; Pearce WJ; Tinnin M Laryngoscope; 1986 May; 96(5):480-3. PubMed ID: 3517533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Porous high-density polyethylene implants in auricular reconstruction. Williams JD; Romo T; Sclafani AP; Cho H Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Jun; 123(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 9193216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biofunctionalization of silicone rubber with microgroove-patterned surface and carbon-ion implantation to enhance biocompatibility and reduce capsule formation. Lei ZY; Liu T; Li WJ; Shi XH; Fan DL Int J Nanomedicine; 2016; 11():5563-5572. PubMed ID: 27822035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Porous synthetic materials in external ear reconstruction]. Berghaus A; Axhausen M; Handrock M Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1983 Jul; 62(7):320-7. PubMed ID: 6225917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Follow-up study of reconstructed auricle in microtia: comparison of the results of the rib cartilage framework and the silicone rubber framework methods. Matsunaga T; Fujita N; Kitaoku Y; Kashiwagi N; Ohta K; Iwasaki H; Ohhira S; Sano M; Tominaga Y Auris Nasus Larynx; 1989; 16(2):75-88. PubMed ID: 2803118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reconstruction of a malformed external ear by an endoprosthesis of porous polyethylene with an integrated suction system]. Holtmann S; Kastenbauer E Laryngorhinootologie; 1993 Jan; 72(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 8439357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of Facial Implants for Bacterial Biofilm Formation Using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Walker TJ; Toriumi DM JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2016 Jul; 18(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 27149574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The natural history of alloplastic implants in orbital floor reconstruction: an animal model. Dougherty WR; Wellisz T J Craniofac Surg; 1994 Feb; 5(1):26-32; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 8031975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rate of vascularization and exposure of silicone-capped porous polyethylene spherical implants: an animal model. Kalwerisky K; Mihora L; Czyz CN; Foster JA; Holck DE Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013; 29(5):350-6. PubMed ID: 23811596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]