These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2301909)

  • 1. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Dehn TC
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
    Kmiot WA; Kirby RM; Akinola D; Temple JG
    Br J Surg; 1991 Oct; 78(10):1181-4. PubMed ID: 1958979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term results of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux.
    Maxwell-Armstrong CA; Steele RJ; Amar SS; Evans D; Morris DL; Foster GE; Hardcastle JD
    Br J Surg; 1997 Jun; 84(6):862-4. PubMed ID: 9189111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the management of failed Angelchik prosthesis.
    Jalil O; Zia MK; Hassn A; Morcous P
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 21190477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oesophageal erosion of an Angelchik prosthesis: surgical management using fundoplication.
    Purkiss SF; Argano VA; Kuo J; Lewis CT
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6(9):517-8. PubMed ID: 1389267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Angelchik prosthesis behaves as a fundoplication.
    Lee JR; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Mar; 75(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 8476193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Angelchik prosthesis for gastro-oesophageal reflux: symptomatic and objective assessment.
    Weaver RM; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep; 67(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 4051424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis and postoperative dysphagia.
    Leguit P; Hagen WB; Laarman J
    Neth J Surg; 1987 Jun; 39(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 3614751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The Angelchik prosthesis--intermediate term evaluation and results].
    Siewert JR; Feussner H
    Z Gastroenterol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):421-9. PubMed ID: 3064455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of a prospective randomized trial of the Angelchik prosthesis and of a consecutive series of 119 patients.
    Eyre-Brook IA; Codling BW; Gear MW
    Br J Surg; 1993 May; 80(5):602-4. PubMed ID: 8518898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Appraisal of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis based on clinical and manometric data and pH monitoring.
    de Caestecker JS; Ross HM; Heading RC; Macleod IB
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1989 Feb; 34(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 2709364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized double-blind study of gastroesophageal reflux surgery in pediatric-sized developmentally disabled patients: Nissen fundoplication versus Angelchik prosthesis.
    Gourley GR; Pellett JR; Li BU; Adkins WN
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1986 Jan; 5(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 2935608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized controlled trial comparing Nissen fundoplication and the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Hill AD; Walsh TN; Bolger CM; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1994 Jan; 81(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 8313128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.
    Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Salama FD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1986 Jan; 68(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 3947019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total (Nissen) versus posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease based on preoperative oesophageal manometry.
    Booth MI; Stratford J; Jones L; Dehn TC
    Br J Surg; 2008 Jan; 95(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 18076018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angelchik prosthesis revisited.
    Varshney S; Kelly JJ; Branagan G; Somers SS; Kelly JM
    World J Surg; 2002 Jan; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 11898046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Kauten JR; Mansour KA
    Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The Angelchik prosthesis in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux].
    Myrhøj T; Andersen LI; Boesby S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Mar; 151(10):627-9. PubMed ID: 2922832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.