454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23019823)
1. Demonstration of fuel switching on oceangoing vessels in the Gulf of Mexico.
Browning L; Hartley S; Bandemehr A; Gathright K; Miller W
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Sep; 62(9):1093-101. PubMed ID: 23019823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of two mitigation strategies for container vessels: cleaner engines and cleaner fuels.
Khan MY; Giordano M; Gutierrez J; Welch WA; Asa-Awuku A; Miller JW; Cocker DR
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 May; 46(9):5049-56. PubMed ID: 22468877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of emission control areas on atmospheric pollutant emissions from major ocean-going ships entering the Shanghai Port, China.
Wan Z; Zhang Q; Xu Z; Chen J; Wang Q
Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 May; 142():525-532. PubMed ID: 31232333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary particulate matter from ocean-going engines in the Southern California Air Basin.
Agrawal H; Eden R; Zhang X; Fine PM; Katzenstein A; Miller JW; Ospital J; Teffera S; Cocker DR
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jul; 43(14):5398-402. PubMed ID: 19708372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of switching to lower sulfur marine fuel oil on air quality in the San Francisco Bay area.
Tao L; Fairley D; Kleeman MJ; Harley RA
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Sep; 47(18):10171-8. PubMed ID: 23944938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Greenhouse gas and criteria emission benefits through reduction of vessel speed at sea.
Khan MY; Agrawal H; Ranganathan S; Welch WA; Miller JW; Cocker DR
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 46(22):12600-7. PubMed ID: 22974075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between atmospheric pollutant emissions and fuel qualities of inland vessels in Jiangsu Province, China.
Cao Y; Zhang W; Wang X; Wu L; Qian G
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 30296389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of atmospheric emissions from maritime activity in the Veracruz port, Mexico.
Fuentes García G; Baldasano Recio JM; Sosa Echeverría R; Granados Hernández E; Zamora Vargas E; Antonio Duran R; Kahl JW
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Aug; 71(8):934-948. PubMed ID: 33709877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Particle emissions from ships: dependence on fuel type.
Winnes H; Fridell E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Dec; 59(12):1391-8. PubMed ID: 20066904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diverse changes in shipping emissions around the Western Pacific ports under the coeffect of the epidemic and fuel oil policy.
Yuan Y; Zhang Y; Mao J; Yu G; Xu K; Zhao J; Qian H; Wu L; Yang X; Chen Y; Ma W
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jun; 879():162892. PubMed ID: 36934943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of PM
Zhao J; Zhang Y; Wang T; Sun L; Yang Z; Lin Y; Chen Y; Mao H
Chemosphere; 2019 Jun; 225():43-52. PubMed ID: 30856474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emissions tradeoffs among alternative marine fuels: total fuel cycle analysis of residual oil, marine gas oil, and marine diesel oil.
Corbett JJ; Winebrake JJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Apr; 58(4):538-42. PubMed ID: 18422040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduction of atmospheric emissions due to switching from fuel oil to natural gas at a power plant in a critical area in Central Mexico.
Sosa E R; Vega E; Wellens A; Jaimes M; Fuentes G G; Granados H E; Alarcón J AL; Torres B MDC; Sánchez A P; Rosas A S; Mateos D E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Oct; 70(10):1043-1059. PubMed ID: 32845797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of fuel quality regulation and speed reductions on shipping emissions: implications for climate and air quality.
Lack DA; Cappa CD; Langridge J; Bahreini R; Buffaloe G; Brock C; Cerully K; Coffman D; Hayden K; Holloway J; Lerner B; Massoli P; Li SM; McLaren R; Middlebrook AM; Moore R; Nenes A; Nuaaman I; Onasch TB; Peischl J; Perring A; Quinn PK; Ryerson T; Schwartz JP; Spackman R; Wofsy SC; Worsnop D; Xiang B; Williams E
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(20):9052-60. PubMed ID: 21910443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of emission control technologies for auxiliary engines on ocean-going vessels.
Jayaram V; Nigam A; Welch WA; Miller JW; Cocker DR
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Jan; 61(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 21305884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total life cycle emissions of post-Panamax containerships powered by conventional fuel or natural gas.
Hua J; Cheng CW; Hwang DS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Feb; 69(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30067463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis and measurement of SOx, CO
Murcia González JC
Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Jun; 193(6):374. PubMed ID: 34061261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comprehensive analysis of the air quality impacts of switching a marine vessel from diesel fuel to natural gas.
Peng W; Yang J; Corbin J; Trivanovic U; Lobo P; Kirchen P; Rogak S; Gagné S; Miller JW; Cocker D
Environ Pollut; 2020 Nov; 266(Pt 3):115404. PubMed ID: 32829034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Source apportionment of PM
Kotchenruther RA
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Sep; 71(9):1114-1126. PubMed ID: 33856962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Energy use and emissions from marine vessels: a total fuel life cycle approach.
Winebrake JJ; Corbett JJ; Meyer PE
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Jan; 57(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 17269235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
