197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23019990)
1. Gastrointestinal tract wall visualization and distention during abdominal and pelvic multidetector CT with a neutral barium sulphate suspension: comparison with positive barium sulphate suspension and with water.
Oliva MR; Erturk SM; Ichikawa T; Rocha T; Ros PR; Silverman SG; Mortele KJ
JBR-BTR; 2012; 95(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 23019990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
Erturk SM; Mortelé KJ; Oliva MR; Ichikawa T; Silverman SG; Cantisani V; Pagliara E; Ros PR
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 17604930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Dillman JR; Towbin AJ; Imbus R; Young J; Gates E; Trout AT
Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 29737955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT.
Megibow AJ; Babb JS; Hecht EM; Cho JJ; Houston C; Boruch MM; Williams AB
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16293806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
Makarawo TP; Negussie E; Malde S; Tilak J; Gayagoy J; Watson J; Francis F; Lincoln D; Jacobs MJ
Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomography of the bowel: a prospective comparison study between four techniques.
Paparo F; Garlaschi A; Biscaldi E; Bacigalupo L; Cevasco L; Rollandi GA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 82(1):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 22999647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of low-density neutral oral contrast material in PET/CT for tumor imaging: results of a randomized clinical trial.
Otero HJ; Yap JT; Patak MA; Erturk SM; Israel DA; Johnston CJ; Sakellis C; Rybicki FJ; Van den Abbeele AD; Ros PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 19620427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of bowel distension and bowel wall visualization according to patient positions during administration of oral contrast media for CT enterography.
Lee SB; Kim SH; Son JH; Baik JY
Br J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 90(1080):20170352. PubMed ID: 28972790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gastrointestinal tract labeling for MDCT of abdomen: comparison of low density barium and low density barium in combination with water.
Gulati K; Shah ZK; Sainani N; Uppot R; Sahani DV
Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):868-73. PubMed ID: 18183403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multi-detector row CT of the small bowel: peak enhancement temporal window--initial experience.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; DeLong DM; Jaffe TA; Merkle EM; Paulson EK; Thomas J
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):438-44. PubMed ID: 17384239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accelerating the transit time of barium sulphate suspensions in small bowel examinations.
Summers DS; Roger MD; Allan PL; Murchison JT
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 62(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 17174502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of neutral oral contrast versus positive oral contrast medium in abdominal multidetector CT.
Berther R; Patak MA; Eckhardt B; Erturk SM; Zollikofer CL
Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1902-9. PubMed ID: 18414870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Bowel Wall Enhancement for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Ischemia in Patients with Small Bowel Obstruction: Value of Adding Unenhanced CT to Contrast-enhanced CT.
Chuong AM; Corno L; Beaussier H; Boulay-Coletta I; Millet I; Hodel J; Taourel P; Chatellier G; Zins M
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 26866378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary studies of the gastrointestinal tract with colloidal barium.
WINDHOLZ F; KAPLAN HS; JONES HH
Calif Med; 1951 Mar; 74(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 14812347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multidetector CT enteroclysis versus barium enteroclysis with methylcellulose in patients with suspected small bowel disease.
Minordi LM; Vecchioli A; Guidi L; Mirk P; Fiorentini L; Bonomo L
Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1527-36. PubMed ID: 16552508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Low-Dose Multidetector Computed Tomography Whole Gastroenterography With Oral Administration of Contrast Agents.
Guo Y; Wang QJ; Shi LJ; Hu YY; Li WP
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Aug; 72(3):410-417. PubMed ID: 32066248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of neutral oral contrast agents for assessment of the small bowel at abdominal staging CT.
Kaireit TF; Huisinga C; Peperhove M; Wacker F; Ringe KI
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225160. PubMed ID: 31725763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The marking of the gastrointestinal tract in computed tomography: experiences with a barium sulfate contrast medium (Micropaque CT)].
Golder W; Viermetz M; Gmeinwieser J
Rofo; 1991 Dec; 155(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 1764598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
