These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23020134)

  • 1. The effects of competition on the strength and softness of selection.
    Ho EK; Agrawal AF
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2537-46. PubMed ID: 23020134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in the strength and softness of selection on deleterious mutations.
    Laffafian A; King JD; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3232-41. PubMed ID: 20662923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecological determinants of mutation load and inbreeding depression in subdivided populations.
    Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2010 Aug; 176(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 20545488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wang AD; Sharp NP; Spencer CC; Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 19852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2008 Apr; 62(4):857-67. PubMed ID: 18221380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of the distribution of mutational fitness effects to environment, genetic background, and adaptedness: a case study with Drosophila.
    Wang AD; Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2014 Mar; 68(3):840-53. PubMed ID: 24206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Bolnick DI
    Nature; 2001 Mar; 410(6827):463-6. PubMed ID: 11260712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hollis B; Fierst JL; Houle D
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19154371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of pathogens on selection against deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Young JA; Yourth CP; Agrawal AF
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Oct; 22(10):2125-9. PubMed ID: 19694894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Local adaptation when competition depends on phenotypic similarity.
    Burgess SC; Waples RS; Baskett ML
    Evolution; 2013 Oct; 67(10):3012-22. PubMed ID: 24094350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additive genetic variation under intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection: a two-locus study.
    Bürger R
    Theor Popul Biol; 2002 Mar; 61(2):197-213. PubMed ID: 11969390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in the strength of inbreeding depression across environments: effects of stress and density dependence.
    Yun L; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3599-606. PubMed ID: 25213285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental evidence that competition and habitat use shape the individual fitness surface.
    Calsbeek R
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 19120813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Selection on viability of individuals heterozygous for the temperature-sensitive lethal mutation l(2)M167(DTS) in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster].
    Kulikov AM; Marec F; Mitrofanov VG
    Genetika; 2005 Jun; 41(6):759-66. PubMed ID: 16080600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition.
    Bürger R; Schneider KA; Willensdorfer M
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2185-206. PubMed ID: 17236413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chromosomal effects of rapid gene evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Nurminsky D; Aguiar DD; Bustamante CD; Hartl DL
    Science; 2001 Jan; 291(5501):128-30. PubMed ID: 11141564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental evolution of protozoan traits in response to interspecific competition.
    terHorst CP
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 20964780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival of the steepest: hypersensitivity to mutations as an adaptation to soft selection.
    Archetti M
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):740-50. PubMed ID: 19243489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The shape of the competition and carrying capacity kernels affects the likelihood of disruptive selection.
    Baptestini EM; de Aguiar MA; Bolnick DI; Araújo MS
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jul; 259(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 19285511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.