These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23020696)

  • 1. Torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets under the effect of bracket width and free wire length.
    Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Bourauel C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Nov; 15(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 23020696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Eliades T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biomechanical analysis of orthodontic brackets with different closing mechanisms].
    Morina E; Keilig L; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2009 Apr; 54(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 19335123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets.
    Morina E; Eliades T; Pandis N; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 18540011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurements of the torque moment in various archwire-bracket-ligation combinations.
    Hirai M; Nakajima A; Kawai N; Tanaka E; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Sameshima GT; Shimizu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 21571875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets.
    Badawi HM; Toogood RW; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):721-8. PubMed ID: 18456146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems.
    Dalstra M; Eriksen H; Bergamini C; Melsen B
    J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 25588827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro biomechanical analysis of torque capabilities of various 0.018″ lingual bracket-wire systems: total torque play and slot size.
    Daratsianos N; Bourauel C; Fimmers R; Jäger A; Schwestka-Polly R
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):459-69. PubMed ID: 26518759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
    Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation into the mechanical characteristics of select self-ligated brackets at a series of clinically relevant maximum torquing angles: loading and unloading curves and bracket deformation.
    Major TW; Carey JP; Nobes DS; Heo G; Melenka GW; Major PW
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 35(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 21750240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets.
    Archambault A; Major TW; Carey JP; Heo G; Badawi H; Major PW
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):884-9. PubMed ID: 20578859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation into the effects of stainless steel ligature ties on the mechanical characteristics of conventional and self-ligated brackets subjected to torque.
    Al Fakir H; Carey JP; Melenka GW; Nobes DS; Heo G; Major PW
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 24596162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
    Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frictional properties of aesthetic brackets.
    Reicheneder CA; Baumert U; Gedrange T; Proff P; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 17702795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.
    Reicheneder CA; Gedrange T; Berrisch S; Proff P; Baumert U; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 19028673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of multiforce nickel-titanium wires to multistrand wires without force zones in bending and torque measurements.
    Sanders E; Johannessen L; Nadal J; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Nov; 83(6):382-394. PubMed ID: 34228142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets.
    Elayyan F; Silikas N; Bearn D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 20152677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.
    Henao SP; Kusy RP
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15132446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.