150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23021113)
1. Tissue response during self-ligating treatment.
Bolamperti L; Montanari P; Levrini L; Macchi A; Tagliabue A; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 23021113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The monitoring of gingival crevicular fluid volume during orthodontic treatment: a longitudinal randomized split-mouth study.
Drummond S; Canavarro C; Perinetti G; Teles R; Capelli J
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 21273285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Friction: self-ligating brackets].
Thermac G; Morgon L; Godeneche J
Orthod Fr; 2008 Dec; 79(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 19061628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alkaline phosphatase activity in gingival crevicular fluid during human orthodontic tooth movement.
Perinetti G; Paolantonio M; D'Attilio M; D'Archivio D; Tripodi D; Femminella B; Festa F; Spoto G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):548-56. PubMed ID: 12439484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lactate dehydrogenase activity in human gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic treatment: a controlled, short-term longitudinal study.
Perinetti G; Serra E; Paolantonio M; Bruè C; Meo SD; Filippi MR; Festa F; Spoto G
J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 15857076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finishing effectiveness of different archwires using SmartClip™ self-ligating brackets: a clinical study.
Ferrari S; Bellincampi M; Sfondrini MF; Caprioglio A; Gandini P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 24456630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gingival response in orthodontic patients: Comparative study between self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Folco AA; Benítez-Rogé SC; Iglesias M; Calabrese D; Pelizardi C; Rosa A; Brusca MI; Hecht P; Mateu ME
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2014; 27(3):120-4. PubMed ID: 25560690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forces released by nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of buccally displaced teeth.
Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Giuntini V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):316.e1-6; discussion 316-7. PubMed ID: 19732660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Porcelain brackets during initial alignment: are self-ligating cosmetic brackets more efficient?
Miles P; Weyant R
Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20575195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Damon System and release of substance P in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic tooth movement in adults.
Yamaguchi M; Takizawa T; Nakajima R; Imamura R; Kasai K
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 19582258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correction of horizontal and vertical discrepancies with a new interactive self-ligating bracket system: the Quick system.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 21491009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets.
Elayyan F; Silikas N; Bearn D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 20152677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myeloperoxidase enzymatic activity is increased in patients with different levels of dental crowding after initial orthodontic activation.
Navarro-Palacios A; García-López E; Meza-Rios A; Armendariz-Borunda J; Sandoval-Rodríguez A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 24975003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modification of the bidimensional system.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 21789286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
