These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23021971)

  • 1. Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care.
    Ukimura O; Coleman JA; de la Taille A; Emberton M; Epstein JI; Freedland SJ; Giannarini G; Kibel AS; Montironi R; Ploussard G; Roobol MJ; Scattoni V; Jones JS
    Eur Urol; 2013 Feb; 63(2):214-30. PubMed ID: 23021971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic ultrasound-guided saturation and template biopsy of the prostate: indications and advantages of extended sampling.
    Isbarn H; Briganti A; De Visschere PJ; Fütterer JJ; Ghadjar P; Giannarini G; Ost P; Ploussard G; Sooriakumaran P; Surcel CI; van Oort IM; Yossepowitch O; van den Bergh RC;
    Arch Esp Urol; 2015 Apr; 68(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 25948801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
    Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An update on prostate biopsy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Cicione A; De Nunzio C; Manno S; Damiano R; Posti A; Lima E; Tubaro A; Balloni F
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Jun; 70(3):264-274. PubMed ID: 29595039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
    Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
    Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
    Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Freehand versus 3-Dimensional Template Mapping Biopsy Using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Device in Biopsy Naïve Men.
    Zhou SR; Chang E; Patankar A; Huang J; Marks LS; Natarajan S
    J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 31596671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.
    Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incremental value of transition zone and midline apical biopsy at baseline TRUS-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection.
    Somford DM; Vreuls W; Jansen TS; van Basten JP; Vergunst H
    World J Urol; 2014 Apr; 32(2):461-7. PubMed ID: 23873356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anterior apical cores in the initial prostate biopsy does not increase detection of significant prostate cancer.
    Ekin RG; Zorlu F; Akarken I; Yildirim Z; Tarhan H; Koc G; Kucuk U; Bayol U
    Urol J; 2015 Apr; 12(2):2084-9. PubMed ID: 25923153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How many cores are enough? Optimizing the transperineal prostate biopsy template.
    Schaufler C; Daigle R; Singhaviranon S; Gjertson CK; Albertsen PC; Ristau BT
    Urol Oncol; 2022 May; 40(5):191.e1-191.e7. PubMed ID: 35067430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of additional sampling in the TRUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
    Stamatiou K; Alevizos A; Karanasiou V; Mariolis A; Mihas C; Papathanasiou M; Bovis K; Sofras F
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 17495488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
    Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?
    Schouten MG; van der Leest M; Pokorny M; Hoogenboom M; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC; Fütterer JJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 28063613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
    Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.