BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23022992)

  • 1. Hypoactivation in the precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex during ambiguous decision making in individuals with HIV.
    Hall SA; Towe SL; Nadeem MT; Hobkirk AL; Hartley BW; Li R; Huettel SA; Meade CS
    J Neurovirol; 2021 Jun; 27(3):463-475. PubMed ID: 33983505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk-Taking Is Associated with Decreased Subjective Value Signals and Increased Prediction Error Signals in the Hot Columbia Card Task.
    Wüllhorst R; Wüllhorst V; Endrass T
    J Neurosci; 2024 May; 44(21):. PubMed ID: 38561225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risky decisions are influenced by individual attributes as a function of risk preference.
    Lee DG; D'Alessandro M; Iodice P; Calluso C; Rustichini A; Pezzulo G
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Dec; 147():101614. PubMed ID: 37837926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic Decisions with Ambiguous Outcome Magnitudes Vary with Low and High Stakes but Not Trait Anxiety or Depression.
    Zbozinek TD; Charpentier CJ; Qi S; Mobbs D
    Comput Psychiatr; 2021; 5(1):119-139. PubMed ID: 38773996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast & slow decisions under risk: Intuition rather than deliberation drives advantageous choices.
    Voudouri A; Białek M; De Neys W
    Cognition; 2024 Jun; 250():105837. PubMed ID: 38878520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice.
    Dickhaut J; McCabe K; Nagode JC; Rustichini A; Smith K; Pardo JV
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Mar; 100(6):3536-41. PubMed ID: 12626760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choosing increases the value of non-instrumental information.
    Jiwa M; Cooper PS; Chong TT; Bode S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8780. PubMed ID: 33888764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Higher-order risk preferences in social settings.
    Heinrich T; Mayrhofer T
    Exp Econ; 2018; 21(2):434-456. PubMed ID: 29720890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimentally revealed stochastic preferences for multicomponent choice options.
    Pastor-Bernier A; Volkmann K; Stasiak A; Grabenhorst F; Schultz W
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(4):367-384. PubMed ID: 32718155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning about the Ellsberg Paradox reduces, but does not abolish, ambiguity aversion.
    Jia R; Furlong E; Gao S; Santos LR; Levy I
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0228782. PubMed ID: 32130214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational Markers of Risky Decision-making for Identification of Temporal Windows of Vulnerability to Opioid Use in a Real-world Clinical Setting.
    Konova AB; Lopez-Guzman S; Urmanche A; Ross S; Louie K; Rotrosen J; Glimcher PW
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2020 Apr; 77(4):368-377. PubMed ID: 31812982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational psychiatry of impulsivity and risk: how risk and time preferences interact in health and disease.
    Lopez-Guzman S; Konova AB; Glimcher PW
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 374(1766):20180135. PubMed ID: 30966919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk preferences impose a hidden distortion on measures of choice impulsivity.
    Lopez-Guzman S; Konova AB; Louie K; Glimcher PW
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191357. PubMed ID: 29373590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blunted Ambiguity Aversion During Cost-Benefit Decisions in Antisocial Individuals.
    Buckholtz JW; Karmarkar U; Ye S; Brennan GM; Baskin-Sommers A
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2030. PubMed ID: 28515474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monetary, Food, and Social Rewards Induce Similar Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer Effects.
    Lehner R; Balsters JH; Herger A; Hare TA; Wenderoth N
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2016; 10():247. PubMed ID: 28101010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuroanatomy accounts for age-related changes in risk preferences.
    Grubb MA; Tymula A; Gilaie-Dotan S; Glimcher PW; Levy I
    Nat Commun; 2016 Dec; 7():13822. PubMed ID: 27959326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS SYMPTOMS AND AVERSION TO AMBIGUOUS LOSSES IN COMBAT VETERANS.
    Ruderman L; Ehrlich DB; Roy A; Pietrzak RH; Harpaz-Rotem I; Levy I
    Depress Anxiety; 2016 Jul; 33(7):606-613. PubMed ID: 27000639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuroanatomy predicts individual risk attitudes.
    Gilaie-Dotan S; Tymula A; Cooper N; Kable JW; Glimcher PW; Levy I
    J Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 34(37):12394-401. PubMed ID: 25209279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the subjective value of risky and ambiguous options using experimental economics and functional MRI methods.
    Levy I; Rosenberg Belmaker L; Manson K; Tymula A; Glimcher PW
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Sep; (67):e3724. PubMed ID: 23022992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.