BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23023005)

  • 1. Genomic imprinting leads to less selectively maintained polymorphism on X chromosomes.
    Santure AW; Spencer HG
    Genetics; 2012 Dec; 192(4):1455-64. PubMed ID: 23023005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The conflict theory of genomic imprinting: how much can be explained?
    Iwasa Y
    Curr Top Dev Biol; 1998; 40():255-93. PubMed ID: 9673853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of genetic conflict on genomic imprinting and modification of expression at a sex-linked locus.
    Spencer HG; Feldman MW; Clark AG; Weisstein AE
    Genetics; 2004 Jan; 166(1):565-79. PubMed ID: 15020445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutation-selection balance under genomic imprinting at an autosomal locus.
    Spencer HG
    Genetics; 1997 Sep; 147(1):281-7. PubMed ID: 9286687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One- and two-locus population models with differential viability between sexes: parallels between haploid parental selection and genomic imprinting.
    Yanchukov A
    Genetics; 2009 Aug; 182(4):1117-27. PubMed ID: 19448271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matrisibs, patrisibs, and the evolution of imprinting on autosomes and sex chromosomes.
    Brandvain Y
    Am Nat; 2010 Oct; 176(4):511-21. PubMed ID: 20795831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.
    Anderson RJ; Spencer HG
    Genetics; 1999 Dec; 153(4):1949-58. PubMed ID: 10581298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population models of genomic imprinting. II. Maternal and fertility selection.
    Spencer HG; Dorn T; LoFaro T
    Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2391-8. PubMed ID: 16783015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ESS gene expression of X-linked imprinted genes subject to sexual selection.
    Seymour RM; Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Jul; 241(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 16387326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex-differential selection and the evolution of X inactivation strategies.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    PLoS Genet; 2013 Apr; 9(4):e1003440. PubMed ID: 23637618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Population-genetic models of sex-limited genomic imprinting.
    Kelly ST; Spencer HG
    Theor Popul Biol; 2017 Jun; 115():35-44. PubMed ID: 28390880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A robust test for X-chromosome genetic association accounting for X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting.
    Zhang Y; Xu SQ; Liu W; Fung WK; Zhou JY
    Genet Res (Camb); 2020 Apr; 102():e2. PubMed ID: 32234109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of X-linked genomic imprinting.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Genetics; 2001 Aug; 158(4):1801-9. PubMed ID: 11514463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of genomic imprinting: two modifier-locus models.
    Spencer HG; Williams MJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Feb; 51(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 9149816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paternally biased X inactivation in mouse neonatal brain.
    Wang X; Soloway PD; Clark AG
    Genome Biol; 2010; 11(7):R79. PubMed ID: 20663224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic changes in paternal X-chromosome activity during imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice.
    Patrat C; Okamoto I; Diabangouaya P; Vialon V; Le Baccon P; Chow J; Heard E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Mar; 106(13):5198-203. PubMed ID: 19273861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex specific X chromosome expression caused by genomic imprinting.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1999 Apr; 197(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 10196091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis screen for epigenetic mutations in the mouse.
    Percec I; Thorvaldsen JL; Plenge RM; Krapp CJ; Nadeau JH; Willard HF; Bartolomei MS
    Genetics; 2003 Aug; 164(4):1481-94. PubMed ID: 12930754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-imposed silence: parental antagonism and the evolution of X-chromosome inactivation.
    Haig D
    Evolution; 2006 Mar; 60(3):440-7. PubMed ID: 16637489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random X inactivation and extensive mosaicism in human placenta revealed by analysis of allele-specific gene expression along the X chromosome.
    Moreira de Mello JC; de Araújo ES; Stabellini R; Fraga AM; de Souza JE; Sumita DR; Camargo AA; Pereira LV
    PLoS One; 2010 Jun; 5(6):e10947. PubMed ID: 20532033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.