These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23024356)

  • 1. Modeling acuity for optotypes varying in complexity.
    Watson AB; Ahumada AJ
    J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity.
    Hamm LM; Yeoman JP; Anstice N; Dakin SC
    J Vis; 2018 Mar; 18(3):13. PubMed ID: 29677328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection and resolution of vanishing optotype letters in central and peripheral vision.
    Demirel S; Anderson RS; Dakin SC; Thibos LN
    Vision Res; 2012 Apr; 59():9-16. PubMed ID: 22406660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers.
    Simmers AJ; Gray LS; McGraw PV; Winn B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 May; 19(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 10627844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.
    González EG; Tarita-Nistor L; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4838-45. PubMed ID: 17898311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting visual acuity from wavefront aberrations.
    Watson AB; Ahumada AJ
    J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):17.1-19. PubMed ID: 18484856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects.
    Westheimer G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanisms of recognition of the outlines of "vanishing" optotypes.
    Koskin SA; Boiko EV; Sobolev AF; Shelepin YE
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2007 Jan; 37(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17180320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].
    Rassow B; Wang Y
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10483562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation-based evaluation of visual performance to reduce the statistical error of visual acuity.
    Fülep C; Kovács I; Kránitz K; Erdei G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jul; 34(7):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 29036136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of paediatric acuity test optotypes by 6-year-old children.
    Hussaindeen JR; Ramakrishnan B; Ravi A; SundarRaj M; Rakshit A; Nosofsky RM; Candy TR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):964-971. PubMed ID: 37272135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population.
    Zhang JY; Zhang T; Xue F; Liu L; Yu C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2383-90. PubMed ID: 17460306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity.
    Whatham AR; Mermoud C; Déruaz A; Goldschmidt M; Zesiger P; Safran AB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Mar; 26(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 16460316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature detection and letter identification.
    Pelli DG; Burns CW; Farell B; Moore-Page DC
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(28):4646-74. PubMed ID: 16808957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.
    Candy TR; Mishoulam SR; Nosofsky RM; Dobson V
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4307-13. PubMed ID: 21436270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters.
    Wang H; He X; Legge GE
    J Vis; 2014 Jul; 14(8):6. PubMed ID: 24993020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic visual acuity using "far" and "near" targets.
    Peters BT; Bloomberg JJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 15823804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.