These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23024356)

  • 21. [Comparison of objective assessment using the sweep pattern visual evoked response acuity (SPVERA) and illiterate E visual acuity].
    Liu RJ; Liu HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 22(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17190145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using human and model performance to compare MRI reconstructions.
    Tisdall MD; Atkins MS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Nov; 25(11):1510-7. PubMed ID: 17117780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of optotype presentation duration on acuity estimates revisited.
    Heinrich SP; Krüger K; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 248(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 20076965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optotype and grating visual acuity in patients with ocular and cerebral visual impairment.
    Stiers P; Vanderkelen R; Vandenbussche E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Dec; 45(12):4333-9. PubMed ID: 15557440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Desktop publishing and validation of custom near visual acuity charts.
    Marran L; Liu L; Lau G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 85(11):1082-90. PubMed ID: 18981923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Physiological basis of visual acuity measurement].
    Figurska M; Rekas M
    Klin Oczna; 2003; 105(1-2):100-5. PubMed ID: 12866186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
    Grimm W; Rassow B; Wesemann W; Saur K; Hilz R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contours in noise: a role for self-cuing?
    Verghese P
    J Vis; 2009 Dec; 9(13):2.1-16. PubMed ID: 20055535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [DIN-compatible vision assessment of increased reproducibility using staircase measurement and maximum likelihood analysis].
    Weigmann U; Petersen J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 8963126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New visual acuity chart: modification for clinical practice and research.
    Pisarnkorskul P; Singhkuna L
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Mar; 86(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 12757065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction.
    Gupta N; Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 19631128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [How should visual acuity be measured?].
    Langrová H; Hejcmanová D; Peregrin J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1996 Jul; 52(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 8768473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reliability of visual acuity measurements taken with a notebook and a tablet computer in participants who were illiterate to Roman characters.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Sudsakorn N; Somkijrungroj T; Engkagul C; Tiensuwan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Mar; 95 Suppl 3():S109-16. PubMed ID: 22619896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Orientation discrimination in human vision: psychophysics and modeling.
    Beaudot WH; Mullen KT
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):26-46. PubMed ID: 16325222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Visual acuity study in the child 18 months to 2 years old].
    Albouy RP
    Oftalmologia; 1994; 38(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 8155626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital visual acuity test using calculator-type numerals with geometric gradation.
    Lewis JM; Smith TJ
    Ophthalmology; 1987 Feb; 94(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 3574877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vanishing optotypes. New type of acuity test letters.
    Frisén L
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Aug; 104(8):1194-8. PubMed ID: 3741251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preneural limitations on letter identification in central and peripheral vision.
    Beckmann PJ; Legge GE
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Dec; 19(12):2349-62. PubMed ID: 12469729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spatial frequency content of the Cardiff and related acuity tests.
    Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 16390476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The Dutch version of the Radner Reading Chart for assessing vision function].
    Maaijwee KJ; Meulendijks CF; Radner W; van Meurs JC; Hoyng CB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Nov; 151(45):2494-7. PubMed ID: 18062591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.