These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23024795)

  • 1. A peak-clustering method for MEG group analysis to minimise artefacts due to smoothness.
    Gilbert JR; Shapiro LR; Barnes GR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45084. PubMed ID: 23024795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal of spurious coherence in MEG source-space coherence analysis.
    Sekihara K; Owen JP; Trisno S; Nagarajan SS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 58(11):3121-9. PubMed ID: 21824842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of prewhitening beamforming in MEG dual experimental conditions.
    Sekihara K; Hild KE; Dalal SS; Nagarajan SS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1112-21. PubMed ID: 18334403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying true cortical interactions in MEG using the nulling beamformer.
    Hui HB; Pantazis D; Bressler SL; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):3161-74. PubMed ID: 19896541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A hierarchical Bayesian method to resolve an inverse problem of MEG contaminated with eye movement artifacts.
    Fujiwara Y; Yamashita O; Kawawaki D; Doya K; Kawato M; Toyama K; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 19150653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fully automated quality assurance and localization of volumetric MEG for single-subject mapping.
    Stevens T; Bardouille T; Stroink G; Boe S; Patterson S; Beyea S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jun; 266():21-31. PubMed ID: 26993819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
    Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images.
    Barnes GR; Hillebrand A
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2003 Jan; 18(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 12454907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel adaptive beamformer for MEG source reconstruction effective when large background brain activities exist.
    Sekihara K; Hild KE; Nagarajan SS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1755-64. PubMed ID: 16941831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer source reconstruction technique in the presence of additive low-rank interference.
    Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS; Poeppel D; Marantz A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 14723498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Techniques for detection and localization of weak hippocampal and medial frontal sources using beamformers in MEG.
    Mills T; Lalancette M; Moses SN; Taylor MJ; Quraan MA
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Jul; 25(3):248-63. PubMed ID: 22350670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic BSS-based filtering of metallic interference in MEG recordings: definition and validation using simulated signals.
    Migliorelli C; Alonso JF; Romero S; Mañanas MA; Nowak R; Russi A
    J Neural Eng; 2015 Aug; 12(4):046001. PubMed ID: 26015414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Realistic spatial sampling for MEG beamformer images.
    Barnes GR; Hillebrand A; Fawcett IP; Singh KD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Oct; 23(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 15340934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-parametric statistical thresholding of baseline free MEG beamformer images.
    Prendergast G; Johnson SR; Hymers M; Woods W; Green GG
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):906-18. PubMed ID: 20696257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ICA-based artifact correction improves spatial localization of adaptive spatial filters in MEG.
    Fatima Z; Quraan MA; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2013 Sep; 78():284-94. PubMed ID: 23603349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Closely Spaced MEG Source Localization and Functional Connectivity Analysis Using a New Prewhitening Invariance of Noise Space Algorithm.
    Zhang J; Cui Y; Deng L; He L; Zhang J; Zhang J; Zhou Q; Liu Q; Zhang Z
    Neural Plast; 2016; 2016():4890497. PubMed ID: 26819768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maximum contrast beamformer for electromagnetic mapping of brain activity.
    Chen YS; Cheng CY; Hsieh JC; Chen LF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1765-74. PubMed ID: 16941832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.