These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23025165)
1. Payoff changes sensitivity by modulating the processing style. Krol M; EI-Deredy W Perception; 2012; 41(5):623-5. PubMed ID: 23025165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks. Diederich A Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extending effects of salience and payoffs on stimulus discrimination: an experimental simulation of prescription checking. Schell KL; Hunsaker C; Kelley K Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Oct; 103(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 17165400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual load and attentional boost: a study of their interaction. Swallow KM; Jiang YV J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1034-45. PubMed ID: 24364707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulatory fit effects on stimulus identification. Glass BD; Maddox WT; Markman AB Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 21264696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Base-rate and payoff effects in multidimensional perceptual categorization. Maddox WT; Bohil CJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1459-82. PubMed ID: 9835061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis. Diederich A; Busemeyer JR Percept Psychophys; 2006 Feb; 68(2):194-207. PubMed ID: 16773893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probability matching, accuracy maximization, and a test of the optimal classifier's independence assumption in perceptual categorization. Maddox WT; Bohil CJ Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jan; 66(1):104-18. PubMed ID: 15095944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scrambled eyes? Disrupting scene structure impedes focal processing and increases bottom-up guidance. Foulsham T; Alan R; Kingstone A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2008-25. PubMed ID: 21647804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: how global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. Förster J J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):88-111. PubMed ID: 19203171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound affects the speed of visual processing. Keetels M; Vroomen J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):699-708. PubMed ID: 20854000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The contents of perceptual hypotheses: evidence from rapid resumption of interrupted visual search. Jungé JA; Brady TF; Chun MM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):681-9. PubMed ID: 19429951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visibility versus accountability in pooling local motion signals into global motion direction. Raidvee A; Averin K; Allik J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1252-9. PubMed ID: 22648603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acquisition and transfer of attention allocation strategies in a multiple-task work environment. Wang DY; Proctor RW; Pick DF Hum Factors; 2007 Dec; 49(6):995-1004. PubMed ID: 18074699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Executive working memory load does not compromise perceptual processing during visual search: evidence from additive factors analysis. He J; McCarley JS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):308-16. PubMed ID: 20139447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]