These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23025315)

  • 21. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J; Bhatia A; Gupta M; Singh V; Soni J; Soni R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Dental Implant Patient.
    Klokkevold PR
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):521-30. PubMed ID: 26820009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography.
    Bornstein MM; Balsiger R; Sendi P; von Arx T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 21039896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The CT/CBCT-based team approach to care. Part I: Identiying the implant patient and prosthetic options.
    Tischler M; Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2012 Aug; 31(8):74, 76, 78-9. PubMed ID: 22970599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Case History Report: Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Implant Insertion Guidance in the Presence of a Dense Bone Island.
    Li ZJ; Lai RF; Feng ZQ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):186-7. PubMed ID: 26929962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Predictability of Suitable Implant Lengths as related to Accurate Treatment Planning using Recent Roentgenographic Measures: A Key to Success.
    Suvarna S; Singh RK; Pachar RB; Kundra S; Arya S; Mehta LK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):535-540. PubMed ID: 29807963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical application of a stereolithographic surgical guide for simple positioning of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Kim SH; Kang JM; Choi B; Nelson G
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 19146019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of linear measurements of bone for implant sites in the presence of metallic artefacts using cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
    Cremonini CC; Dumas M; Pannuti CM; Neto JB; Cavalcanti MG; Lima LA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):845-50. PubMed ID: 21621979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rehabilitation of an edentulous mandible with an implant-supported prosthesis.
    LoCascio SJ; Salinas TJ
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1997 Apr; 9(3):357-68; quiz 370. PubMed ID: 9553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement.
    Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    Periodontol 2000; 2014 Oct; 66(1):203-13. PubMed ID: 25123769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of postoperative labial bone thickness in maxillary anterior implants: comparing immediate and delayed implant placement.
    Miyamoto Y; Obama T
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011 Jun; 31(3):215-25. PubMed ID: 21556378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Markers for implant placement in CBCT: a technical overview.
    Forbes-Haley CE; King PA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Dec; 21(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 24479212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. "Rules of Six"--diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for single-tooth implant success.
    Cooper LF; Pin-Harry OC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Feb; 34(2):94-8, 100-1; quiz 102, 117. PubMed ID: 23556318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding contemporary surgical and radiographic techniques in implant dentistry.
    Bornstein MM; Al-Nawas B; Kuchler U; Tahmaseb A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():78-82. PubMed ID: 24660191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Treatment planning for restorative implantology.
    Boyce RA; Klemons G
    Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Apr; 59(2):291-304. PubMed ID: 25835794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before-after study.
    Shelley AM; Ferrero A; Brunton P; Goodwin M; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140316. PubMed ID: 25472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should Cone Beam Computed Tomography Be Routinely Obtained in Implant Planning?
    Omami G; Al Yafi F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):363-379. PubMed ID: 31097132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.