These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

537 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23025489)

  • 21. Distortion of CAD-CAM-fabricated implant-fixed titanium and zirconia complete dental prosthesis frameworks.
    Al-Meraikhi H; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Brantley WA; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 28477917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Adaptation of Single-Unit Screw-Retained Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture Abutments After Mechanical Cycling.
    Markarian RA; Galles DP; Gomes França FM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):127–136. PubMed ID: 28632256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Volumetric determination of the amount of misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a multicenter laboratory study.
    Drago C; Saldarriaga RL; Domagala D; Almasri R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):920-9. PubMed ID: 20862405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative evaluation of BioHPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Jin HY; Teng MH; Wang ZJ; Li X; Liang JY; Wang WX; Jiang S; Zhao BD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Oct; 122(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30982624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation and comparison of vertical marginal fit of three different types of multiunit screw-retained framework fabricated for an implant-supported prosthesis - An
    Singh M; Yadav BK; Phukela SS; Ritwal P; Nagpal A; Saluja P
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 36511053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modified section method for laser-welding of ill-fitting cp Ti and Ni-Cr alloy one-piece cast implant-supported frameworks.
    Tiossi R; Falcão-Filho H; Aguiar Júnior FA; Rodrigues RC; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 20149062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Precision Fit of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated by CAD/CAM, Copy-Milling, and Conventional Methods.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Carreiro AF; Barbosa GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):507–513. PubMed ID: 27706265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fit of 3Y-TZP complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses before and after porcelain veneering.
    Svanborg P; Norström Saarva V; Stenport V; Eliasson A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):137-141. PubMed ID: 30885581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations.
    Karl M; Holst S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 22371839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Torque loss under mechanical cycling of long-span zirconia and titanium-cemented and screw-retained implant-supported CAD/CAM frameworks.
    Gomes ÉA; Tiossi R; Faria AC; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1395-402. PubMed ID: 25539006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM frameworks in multiple implant-supported restorations: Scanning and milling error analysis.
    Uribarri A; Bilbao-Uriarte E; Segurola A; Ugarte D; Verdugo F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):1062-1072. PubMed ID: 31454146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia frameworks for implant-supported full-arch fixed dental prosthesis.
    Tiossi R; Gomes ÉA; Faria ACL; Rodrigues RCS; Ribeiro RF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 19(5):860-866. PubMed ID: 28772024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An assessment of the passivity of the fit of multiunit screw-retained implant frameworks manufactured by using additive and subtractive technologies.
    Abu Ghofa A; Önöral Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 34294420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
    Takahashi T; Gunne J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Effect of materials and superstructure designs on the passive fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses].
    Song S; Zheng Z; Yang LY; Gao X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 37(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 30854816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A microstrain comparison of passively fitting screw-retained and cemented titanium frameworks.
    de Vasconcellos DK; Kojima AN; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA; Ozcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):834-8. PubMed ID: 24798096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vertical microgap and passivity of fit of three-unit implant-supported frameworks fabricated using different techniques.
    Berejuk HM; Shimizu RH; de Mattias Sartori IA; Valgas L; Tiossi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1064-70. PubMed ID: 25216131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A simplified method to assess precision of fit between framework and supporting implants: a preliminary study.
    Calderini A; Maiorana C; Garlini G; Abbondanza T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 17974120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.