These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23025708)

  • 1. The suitability of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) as a screening tool: IRT-based evidence.
    Chiesi F; Donati MA; Galli S; Primi C
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Mar; 27(1):287-93. PubMed ID: 23025708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
    Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
    Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Item Response Theory-Based Scoring of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised Adolescents.
    Anselmi P; Colledani D; Andreotti A; Robusto E; Fabbris L; Vian P; Genetti B; Mortali C; Minutillo A; Mastrobattista L; Pacifici R
    Assessment; 2022 Oct; 29(7):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 34036842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) revisited: a cut-point analysis.
    Boudreau B; Poulin C
    J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 17180721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensions of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in Finland: A cross-sectional population study.
    Salonen AH; Rosenström T; Edgren R; Volberg R; Alho H; Castrén S
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Jun; 58(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 28247931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties.
    Raylu N; Oei TP
    Addiction; 2004 Jun; 99(6):757-69. PubMed ID: 15139874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth.
    Ladouceur R; Ferland F; Poulin C; Vitaro F; Wiebe J
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16187805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Problem and probable pathological gambling among older adults assessed by the SOGS-R.
    Wiebe JM; Cox BJ
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 15870987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the Rasch model to evaluate the South Oaks Gambling Screen for use with nonpathological gamblers.
    Strong DR; Breen RB; Lesieur HR; Lejuez CW
    Addict Behav; 2003 Oct; 28(8):1465-72. PubMed ID: 14512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Problematic and pathologic gambling in Hungary: the Hungarian version and use of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS-HU)].
    Gyollai A; Urbán R; Kun B; Paksi B; Arnold P; Balázs H; Kökönyei G; Oláh A; Demetrovics Z
    Psychiatr Hung; 2011; 26(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 22058255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A critical review of adolescent problem gambling assessment instruments.
    Stinchfield R
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2010; 22(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 20491419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric Properties of the South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents in Chinese Adolescent Gamblers.
    Zhou H; Chen JH; Ling H; Tong KK; Wu AMS
    Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1605182. PubMed ID: 36466009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
    Kido M; Shimazaki T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Italian Adolescent Gambling Behaviour: Psychometric Evaluation of the South Oaks Gambling Screen: Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) among a sample of Italian students.
    Colasante E; Gori M; Bastiani L; Scalese M; Siciliano V; Molinaro S
    J Gambl Stud; 2014 Dec; 30(4):789-801. PubMed ID: 23740346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence estimates of gambling participation and problem gambling among 16-18-year-old students in Iceland: a comparison of the SOGS-RA and DSM-IV-MR-J.
    Olason DT; Sigurdardottir KJ; Smari J
    J Gambl Stud; 2006; 22(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 16374661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
    Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students.
    Weinstock J; Whelan JP; Meyers AW; McCausland C
    Assessment; 2007 Dec; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 17986657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA): further psychometric findings from a community sample.
    Wiebe JM; Cox BJ; Mehmel BG
    J Gambl Stud; 2000; 16(2-3):275-88. PubMed ID: 14634316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Co-occurrence of addictive behaviours: personality factors related to substance use, gambling and computer gaming.
    Walther B; Morgenstern M; Hanewinkel R
    Eur Addict Res; 2012; 18(4):167-74. PubMed ID: 22398819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
    Stinchfield R
    Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.