201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23025794)
1. Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain.
Zakis JA; Fulton B; Steele BR
Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):906-13. PubMed ID: 23025794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.
Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 21319935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.
Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M
Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preferred signal path delay and high-pass cut-off in open fittings.
Bramsløw L
Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):634-44. PubMed ID: 20602601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does enriched acoustic environment in humans abolish chronic tinnitus clinically and electrophysiologically? A double blind placebo controlled study.
Vanneste S; van Dongen M; De Vree B; Hiseni S; van der Velden E; Strydis C; Joos K; Norena A; Serdijn W; De Ridder D
Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():141-8. PubMed ID: 23104014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
Moore BC; Sęk A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of a new hearing aid anti-cardioid directivity pattern.
Mueller HG; Weber J; Bellanova M
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 21271803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Refractory effects of the N1 event-related potential in experienced cochlear implant patients.
Cowper-Smith CD; Green J; Maessen H; Bance M; Newman AJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 23282338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of bandwidth, compression speed, and gain at high frequencies on preferences for amplified music.
Moore BC
Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):159-72. PubMed ID: 23172008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss.
Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Nyffeler M; Boretzki M; Caraway T; Hudson M
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 21599615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear Nucleus CI24RE device: relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles.
Battmer RD; Dillier N; Lai WK; Begall K; Leypon EE; González JC; Manrique M; Morera C; Müller-Deile J; Wesarg T; Zarowski A; Killian MJ; von Wallenberg E; Smoorenburg GF
Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):657-66. PubMed ID: 20583945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).
Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):611-4. PubMed ID: 22894182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploration of a physiologically-inspired hearing-aid algorithm using a computer model mimicking impaired hearing.
Jürgens T; Clark NR; Lecluyse W; Meddis R
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):346-57. PubMed ID: 26918797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) detection and estimated audibility in infants with sensorineural hearing loss.
Chang HW; Dillon H; Carter L; van Dun B; Young ST
Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):663-70. PubMed ID: 22873205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prescription of hearing-aid output for tinnitus relief.
Shekhawat GS; Searchfield GD; Kobayashi K; Stinear CM
Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):617-25. PubMed ID: 23859059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
Dawes P; Hopkins R; Munro KJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
