These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23025828)

  • 21. Head direction cells recorded in the anterior thalamic nuclei of freely moving rats.
    Taube JS
    J Neurosci; 1995 Jan; 15(1 Pt 1):70-86. PubMed ID: 7823153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of conflicting visual, inertial and substratal cues on head direction cell activity.
    Zugaro MB; Tabuchi E; Wiener SI
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jul; 133(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 10968220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Delayed development of place navigation compared to directional responding in young rats.
    Akers KG; Candelaria-Cook FT; Rice JP; Johnson TE; Hamilton DA
    Behav Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 123(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 19331450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Place cells recorded in the parasubiculum of freely moving rats.
    Taube JS
    Hippocampus; 1995; 5(6):569-83. PubMed ID: 8646283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cue control and head direction cells.
    Goodridge JP; Dudchenko PA; Worboys KA; Golob EJ; Taube JS
    Behav Neurosci; 1998 Aug; 112(4):749-61. PubMed ID: 9733184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Path integration: how the head direction signal maintains and corrects spatial orientation.
    Valerio S; Taube JS
    Nat Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 15(10):1445-53. PubMed ID: 22983210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Context-independent directional cue learning by hippocampal place cells.
    Chakraborty S; Anderson MI; Chaudhry AM; Mumford JC; Jeffery KJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Jul; 20(1):281-92. PubMed ID: 15245500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of path integration versus environmental orientation on place cell remapping between visually identical environments.
    Fuhs MC; Vanrhoads SR; Casale AE; McNaughton B; Touretzky DS
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 94(4):2603-16. PubMed ID: 15958602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Entorhinal cortex lesions impair the use of distal but not proximal landmarks during place navigation in the rat.
    Parron C; Poucet B; Save E
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 154(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 15313022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sequential control of navigation by locale and taxon cues in the Morris water task.
    Hamilton DA; Rosenfelt CS; Whishaw IQ
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 154(2):385-97. PubMed ID: 15313026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Landmark control and updating of self-movement cues are largely maintained in head direction cells after lesions of the posterior parietal cortex.
    Calton JL; Turner CS; Cyrenne DL; Lee BR; Taube JS
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 122(4):827-40. PubMed ID: 18729636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of salient and non-salient visuospatial cues by rats in the Morris Water Maze.
    Young GS; Choleris E; Kirkland JB
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):794-9. PubMed ID: 16516936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rat head direction cell responses in zero-gravity parabolic flight.
    Taube JS; Stackman RW; Calton JL; Oman CM
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 92(5):2887-997. PubMed ID: 15212426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence for a relationship between place-cell spatial firing and spatial memory performance.
    Lenck-Santini PP; Save E; Poucet B
    Hippocampus; 2001; 11(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 11530842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An analysis of response, direction, and place learning in an open field and T maze.
    Skinner DM; Etchegary CM; Ekert-Maret EC; Baker CJ; Harley CW; Evans JH; Martin GM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 12561129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Different responses in two strains of chickens (Gallus gallus) in a magnetic orientation test.
    Freire R; Munro U; Rogers LJ; Sagasser S; Wiltschko R; Wiltschko W
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jul; 11(3):547-52. PubMed ID: 18297318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mammillothalamic tract lesions disrupt dead reckoning in the rat.
    Winter SS; Wagner SJ; McMillin JL; Wallace DG
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 33(2):371-81. PubMed ID: 21138488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Study of CA1 place cell activity and exploratory behavior following spatial and nonspatial changes in the environment.
    Lenck-Santini PP; Rivard B; Muller RU; Poucet B
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 15602750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of landmark salience in a navigation task: an additive effect between its components.
    Chamizo VD; Rodrigo T; Peris JM; Grau M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 16834501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Geometric cues influence head direction cells only weakly in nondisoriented rats.
    Knight R; Hayman R; Lin Ginzberg L; Jeffery K
    J Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 31(44):15681-92. PubMed ID: 22049411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.