391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23027364)
41. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Low-Grade Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Bovonratwet P; Samuel AM; Mok JK; Vaishnav AS; Morse KW; Song J; Steinhaus ME; Jordan YJ; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(21):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 35867599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Morphologic Changes of Intervertebral Foramen After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Radiographic and Clinical Study.
Liu W; Zhao Y; Jia J; Chen X; Mai R; Yuan S; Tian Y; Liu X
World Neurosurg; 2020 Oct; 142():e151-e159. PubMed ID: 32599187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion.
Sheng SR; Geng YB; Zhou KL; Wu AM; Wang XY; Ni WF
J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Jan; 9(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 31838875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life.
Adogwa O; Parker SL; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):479-84. PubMed ID: 21336176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Minimally Invasive or Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.
Jia J; Chen C; Wang P; Wang L; Liu X
Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Feb; 36(1):E45-E50. PubMed ID: 35675143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Fan G; Wu X; Yu S; Sun Q; Guan X; Zhang H; Gu X; He S
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9540298. PubMed ID: 27747244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
Tian Y; Liu X
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2.
Wang J; Zhou Y; Zhang ZF; Li CQ; Zheng WJ; Liu J
Eur Spine J; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1780-4. PubMed ID: 20411281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Clinical and radiologic comparison of anterior-posterior single-position lateral surgery versus MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Kotani Y; Koike Y; Ikeura A; Tokunaga H; Saito T
J Orthop Sci; 2021 Nov; 26(6):992-998. PubMed ID: 33339720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with or without reduction: A comparative study.
Fan G; Zhang H; Guan X; Gu G; Wu X; Hu A; Gu X; He S
J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 33():111-118. PubMed ID: 27443498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis.
Wang YY; Chung YH; Huang CH; Hu MH
J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 May; 19(1):286. PubMed ID: 38725087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up.
Zairi F; Arikat A; Allaoui M; Assaker R
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2013 May; 74(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 23307308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.
Li Y; Dai Y; Wang B; Li L; Li P; Xu J; Jiang B; Lü G
World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e475-e482. PubMed ID: 32891847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Ligamentum-preserved/Temporary Preserved Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: Technical Note and 2-year Follow-up.
Wang L; Li H; Zhao Y; Yuan S; Tian Y; Liu X
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Apr; 47(8):E328-E336. PubMed ID: 34075012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: 5-Year Outcomes.
Yang Y; Liu ZY; Zhang LM; Pang M; Chhantyal K; Wu WB; Chen ZH; Luo CX; Rong LM; Liu B
World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e602-e610. PubMed ID: 29778600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
