These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23027492)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of endplate forces generated by uniaxial screws and monoaxial pedicle screws.
    Essig DA; Miller CP; Xiao M; Ivancic P; Jegede K; Badrinath R; Smith BG; Grauer JN
    Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10):e1528-32. PubMed ID: 23027492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine instrumentation.
    Wang X; Aubin CE; Crandall D; Parent S; Labelle H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(14):E823-35. PubMed ID: 22310096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical analysis of corrective forces in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment.
    Wang X; Aubin CE; Labelle H; Parent S; Crandall D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(24):E1479-87. PubMed ID: 23151872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis.
    Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A biomechanical investigation of different screw head designs for vertebral derotation in scoliosis surgery.
    Liu PY; Lai PL; Lin CL
    Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 28414169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment of thoracic scoliosis: are monoaxial thoracic pedicle screws the best form of fixation for correction?
    Lonner BS; Auerbach JD; Boachie-Adjei O; Shah SA; Hosogane N; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):845-51. PubMed ID: 19365255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
    Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does a novel monoplanar pedicle screw perform biomechanically relative to monoaxial and polyaxial designs?
    Schroerlucke SR; Steklov N; Mundis GM; Marino JF; Akbarnia BA; Eastlack RK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2826-32. PubMed ID: 24920048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.
    Derincek A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 16778665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and biomechanical study of a modified pedicle screw.
    Liu T; Zheng WJ; Li CQ; Liu GD; Zhou Y
    Chin J Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 13(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 20670579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support.
    Chen SH; Mo Lin R; Chen HH; Tsai KJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Mar; 8():28. PubMed ID: 17349057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine.
    Paik H; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Kang DG; Lenke LG
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 22480532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A biomechanical study comparing polyaxial locking screw mechanisms.
    Hebert-Davies J; Laflamme GY; Rouleau D; Canet F; Sandman E; Li A; Petit Y
    Injury; 2013 Oct; 44(10):1358-62. PubMed ID: 23849980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.
    Cullen AB; Curtiss S; Lee MA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Aug; 23(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 19633460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques.
    White KK; Oka R; Mahar AT; Lowry A; Garfin SR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):E355-8. PubMed ID: 16721279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pedicle screw surface coatings improve fixation in nonfusion spinal constructs.
    Upasani VV; Farnsworth CL; Tomlinson T; Chambers RC; Tsutsui S; Slivka MA; Mahar AT; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 19182704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral body.
    Tan JS; Bailey CS; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17268265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Straight-forward versus anatomic trajectory technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation: a biomechanical analysis.
    Lehman RA; Polly DW; Kuklo TR; Cunningham B; Kirk KL; Belmont PJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Sep; 28(18):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14501914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pedicle screw augmentation with polyethylene tape: a biomechanical study in the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine.
    Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 20051920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.