116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23027681)
1. Clay modeling versus written modules as effective interventions in understanding human anatomy.
Bareither ML; Arbel V; Growe M; Muszczynski E; Rudd A; Marone JR
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 23027681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning outcomes and student-perceived value of clay modeling and cat dissection in undergraduate human anatomy and physiology.
DeHoff ME; Clark KL; Meganathan K
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Mar; 35(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21386004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The implementation of clay modeling and rat dissection into the human anatomy and physiology curriculum of a large urban community college.
Haspel C; Motoike HK; Lenchner E
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 23650279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clay modeling as a method to learn human muscles: A community college study.
Motoike HK; O'Kane RL; Lenchner E; Haspel C
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 19189347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance.
Waters JR; Van Meter P; Perrotti W; Drogo S; Cyr RJ
Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Jun; 35(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 21652509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning of cross-sectional anatomy using clay models.
Oh CS; Kim JY; Choe YH
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 19588481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomical knowledge gain through a clay-modeling exercise compared to live and video observations.
Kooloos JG; Schepens-Franke AN; Bergman EM; Donders RA; Vorstenbosch MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(6):420-9. PubMed ID: 24623632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between learning style preferences and anatomy assessment outcomes in graduate-entry and undergraduate medical students.
O'Mahony SM; Sbayeh A; Horgan M; O'Flynn S; O'Tuathaigh CM
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 26845590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective comparative study on enhancing geometrical mental representation and anatomical learning in medical students through modeling clay as an assessment tool.
Yachou Y; Samson O; Lasvergnas O
Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jun; 17(4):779-795. PubMed ID: 38520163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning Styles/Preferences Among Medical Students: Kinesthetic Learner's Multimodal Approach to Learning Anatomy.
Hernandez JE; Vasan N; Huff S; Melovitz-Vasan C
Med Sci Educ; 2020 Dec; 30(4):1633-1638. PubMed ID: 34457831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Team-based learning methods in teaching topographical anatomy by dissection.
Burgess AW; Ramsey-Stewart G; May J; Mellis C
ANZ J Surg; 2012 Jun; 82(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 22590976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of traditional methods with 3D computer models in the instruction of hepatobiliary anatomy.
Keedy AW; Durack JC; Sandhu P; Chen EM; O'Sullivan PS; Breiman RS
Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 21412990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning by drawing and modeling: Teaching modalities for spinal anatomy in medical students.
Beach IR; D'Agostino EN; Thakrar R; Lunardini DJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2023; 16(6):1041-1045. PubMed ID: 37370211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy.
Preece D; Williams SB; Lam R; Weller R
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 23349117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical resident learning styles: faculty and resident accuracy at identification of preferences and impact on ABSITE scores.
Kim RH; Gilbert T; Ristig K; Chu QD
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 23706561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Problem-based learning (PBL): assessing students' learning preferences using VARK.
Alkhasawneh IM; Mrayyan MT; Docherty C; Alashram S; Yousef HY
Nurse Educ Today; 2008 Jul; 28(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 17983691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning styles of first-year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey.
Baykan Z; Naçar M
Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Jun; 31(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 17562904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students.
Wehrwein EA; Lujan HL; DiCarlo SE
Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Jun; 31(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 17562903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation.
Hisley KC; Anderson LD; Smith SE; Kavic SM; Tracy JK
Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19177376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning style preferences of first-year dental students at King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: influence of gender and GPA.
Al-Saud LM
J Dent Educ; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1371-8. PubMed ID: 24098042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
