These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23027783)

  • 1. Judgments about illegal performance-enhancing substances: reasoned, reactive, or both?
    Dodge T; Stock M; Litt D
    J Health Psychol; 2013 Jul; 18(7):962-71. PubMed ID: 23027783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is abstinence an alternative? Predicting adolescent athletes' intentions to use performance enhancing substances.
    Dodge T; Jaccard JJ
    J Health Psychol; 2008 Jul; 13(5):703-11. PubMed ID: 18519443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-control, self-regulation, and doping in sport: a test of the strength-energy model.
    Chan DK; Lentillon-Kaestner V; Dimmock JA; Donovan RJ; Keatley DA; Hardcastle SJ; Hagger MS
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2015 Apr; 37(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 25996110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of Parent-Adolescent Communication About Anabolic Steroids on Adolescent Athletes' Willingness to Try Performance-Enhancing Substances.
    Dodge T; Clarke P
    Subst Use Misuse; 2015; 50(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 25629954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the prototype willingness model to predict doping in sport.
    Whitaker L; Long J; Petróczi A; Backhouse SH
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2014 Oct; 24(5):e398-405. PubMed ID: 25371934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Doping and supplementation: the attitudes of talented young athletes.
    Bloodworth AJ; Petróczi A; Bailey R; Pearce G; McNamee MJ
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2012 Apr; 22(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 20973831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting attitude towards performance enhancing substance use: a comprehensive test of the Sport Drug Control Model with elite Australian athletes.
    Jalleh G; Donovan RJ; Jobling I
    J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Nov; 17(6):574-9. PubMed ID: 24268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inevitable? Doping attitudes among Berliners in 2011: the role of socialist state socialisation and athlete experience.
    Wagner GG; Ziebarth NR
    Eur J Public Health; 2016 Jun; 26(3):520-2. PubMed ID: 27056894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changing attitudes and intentions related to doping: An analysis of individual differences in need for cognition.
    Horcajo J; Santos D; Guyer JJ; Moreno L
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Dec; 37(24):2835-2843. PubMed ID: 31522612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gateway to doping? Supplement use in the context of preferred competitive situations, doping attitude, beliefs, and norms.
    Backhouse SH; Whitaker L; Petróczi A
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2013 Mar; 23(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 22092778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motivational and social cognitive predictors of doping intentions in elite sports: an integrated approach.
    Barkoukis V; Lazuras L; Tsorbatzoudis H; Rodafinos A
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2013 Oct; 23(5):e330-40. PubMed ID: 23574429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Illegal performance enhancing drugs and doping in sport: a picture-based brief implicit association test for measuring athletes' attitudes.
    Brand R; Heck P; Ziegler M
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2014 Jan; 9():7. PubMed ID: 24479865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-admitted behavior and perceived use of performance-enhancing vs psychoactive drugs among competitive athletes.
    Uvacsek M; Nepusz T; Naughton DP; Mazanov J; Ránky MZ; Petróczi A
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2011 Apr; 21(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 19903314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings: a meta-analysis.
    Ntoumanis N; Ng JY; Barkoukis V; Backhouse S
    Sports Med; 2014 Nov; 44(11):1603-24. PubMed ID: 25138312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Young athletes' awareness and monitoring of anti-doping in daily life: Does motivation matter?
    Chan DK; Donovan RJ; Lentillon-Kaestner V; Hardcastle SJ; Dimmock JA; Keatley DA; Hagger MS
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2015 Dec; 25(6):e655-63. PubMed ID: 25441263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doping use meta-analysis: science seasoned with moralistic prejudice.
    Arandjelović O
    Sports Med; 2015 Mar; 45(3):443-4. PubMed ID: 25655374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A philosophical debate on the morality of doping is interesting but beyond the scope of our meta-analysis.
    Ntoumanis N; Ng JY; Barkoukis V; Backhouse S
    Sports Med; 2015 Mar; 45(3):445-6. PubMed ID: 25689956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance-enhancing drug use in young athletes.
    Laos C; Metzl JD
    Adolesc Med Clin; 2006 Oct; 17(3):719-31; abstract xii. PubMed ID: 17030288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of the use of performance-enhancing substances by young athletes.
    Goulet C; Valois P; Buist A; Côté M
    Clin J Sport Med; 2010 Jul; 20(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 20606508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sports psychiatrist and performance-enhancing drugs.
    Creado S; Reardon C
    Int Rev Psychiatry; 2016 Dec; 28(6):564-571. PubMed ID: 27310472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.