These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. [Biomechanical studies of 9 tibial interlocking nails in a bone-implant unit]. Schandelmaier P; Krettek C; Tscherne H Unfallchirurg; 1994 Nov; 97(11):600-8. PubMed ID: 7817197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mechanical study of the safe distance between distal femoral fracture site and distal locking screws in antegrade intramedullary nailing. Antekeier SB; Burden RL; Voor MJ; Roberts CS J Orthop Trauma; 2005; 19(10):693-7. PubMed ID: 16314716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimal location of a single distal interlocking screw in intramedullary nailing of distal third femoral shaft fractures. George CJ; Lindsey RW; Noble PC; Alexander JW; Kamaric E J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 9619462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A prospective study of fractures of the femoral shaft treated with a static, intramedullary, interlocking nail comparing one versus two distal screws. Grover J; Wiss DA Orthop Clin North Am; 1995 Jan; 26(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 7838494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical comparison of flexible stainless steel and titanium nails with external fixation using a femur fracture model. Mani US; Sabatino CT; Sabharwal S; Svach DJ; Suslak A; Behrens FF J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 16557131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical analysis of retrograde intramedullary nail fixation in distal femoral fractures. Chen SH; Yu TC; Chang CH; Lu YC Knee; 2008 Oct; 15(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 18722126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of femoral neck fixation with the reconstruction nail versus cancellous screws in anatomic specimens. Ramser JR; Mihalko WM; Carr JB; Beaudoin AJ; Krause WR Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 May; (290):189-96. PubMed ID: 8472448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Supracondylar femur fracture fixation: mechanical comparison of the 95 degrees condylar side plate and screw versus 95 degrees angled blade plate. Jaakkola JI; Lundy DW; Moore T; Jones B; Ganey TM; Hutton WC Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Jan; 73(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11928916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical evaluation of retrograde intramedullary stabilization for femoral fractures: the effect of fracture level. Goodwin R; Mahar AT; Oka R; Steinman S; Newton PO J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Dec; 27(8):873-6. PubMed ID: 18209606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparative study of stability following the nailing of fractures of the femur shaft. An experimental study with cadaver bones]. Wruhs O Wien Klin Wochenschr Suppl; 1986; 169():3-16. PubMed ID: 3464133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Torsion and bending analysis of internal fixation techniques for femoral neck fractures: the role of implant design and bone density. Swiontkowski MF; Harrington RM; Keller TS; Van Patten PK J Orthop Res; 1987; 5(3):433-44. PubMed ID: 3625366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical analysis of titanium elastic nail fixation in a pediatric femur fracture model. Li Y; Stabile KJ; Shilt JS J Pediatr Orthop; 2008 Dec; 28(8):874-8. PubMed ID: 19034181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retrograde nailing of a femoral supracondyle. Wu CC; Tai CL Orthopedics; 2012 Apr; 35(4):e491-6. PubMed ID: 22495848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical performance of flexible intramedullary nails with end caps tested in distal segmental defects of pediatric femur models. Volpon JB; Perina MM; Okubo R; Maranho DA J Pediatr Orthop; 2012; 32(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 22706460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]