287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23028914)
1. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
Zhang M; Mary Ying YL; Ihlefeld A
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518817464. PubMed ID: 30558491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):101-114. PubMed ID: 34133400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
Dieudonné B; Francart T
Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
Westermann A; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity.
Misurelli SM; Litovsky RY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):319-31. PubMed ID: 26233032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening.
Fathima H; Bhat JS; Pitchaimuthu AN
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3209-3217. PubMed ID: 36695909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advantages from bilateral hearing in speech perception in noise with simulated cochlear implants and residual acoustic hearing.
Schoof T; Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1017-30. PubMed ID: 23363118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing.
Ihlefeld A; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1315-24. PubMed ID: 22352505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.
Corbin NE; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 27787392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
