These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23029855)

  • 1. Identifying themes within a medical school admission committee's reviews of applicants.
    Gilliland WR; Artino AR; Waechter DM; McManigle JE; Cruess DF; Calloway M; Arze BC; Durning SJ
    Mil Med; 2012 Sep; 177(9 Suppl):16-20. PubMed ID: 23029855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A holistic review of the medical school admission process: examining correlates of academic underperformance.
    Stratton TD; Elam CL
    Med Educ Online; 2014; 19():22919. PubMed ID: 24695362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New non-cognitive procedures for medical applicant selection: a qualitative analysis in one school.
    Katz S; Vinker S
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Nov; 14():237. PubMed ID: 25376161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between admissions committee review and student performance in medical school and internship.
    Gilliland WR; Dong T; Artino AR; Waechter DM; Cruess DF; DeZee KJ; McManigle JE; Durning SJ
    Mil Med; 2012 Sep; 177(9 Suppl):21-5. PubMed ID: 23029856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of a rolling admission policy on a medical school's selection of applicants.
    Elam CL; Johnson MM
    Acad Med; 1997 Jul; 72(7):644-6. PubMed ID: 9236477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship of academic success of medical students with motivation and pre-admission grades.
    Luqman M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jan; 23(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 23286620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The applicant pool: the genesis of the physician pipeline.
    Elam CL; Scott KL; Perman JA
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2008 Jun; 106(6):263-9. PubMed ID: 18630036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Analysis of the Optometric Applicant Pool Relative to Matriculants.
    Zadnik K; Reich LN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Sep; 96(9):637-646. PubMed ID: 31479018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A qualitative analysis of statements on motivation of applicants for medical school.
    Wouters A; Bakker AH; van Wijk IJ; Croiset G; Kusurkar RA
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Sep; 14():200. PubMed ID: 25248374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Demographic and socio-economic associations with academic attainment (UCAS tariff scores) in applicants to medical school.
    Powis D; James D; Ferguson E
    Med Educ; 2007 Mar; 41(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 17316208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Have rural background students been disadvantaged by the medical school admission process?
    Wright B; Woloschuk W
    Med Educ; 2008 May; 42(5):476-9. PubMed ID: 18346118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Components of an Evidence-Based Analytic Rubric for Use in Medical School Admissions.
    Shaw GP; Coffman J
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 Jan; 107(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 28271934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Free text adversity statements as part of a contextualised admissions process: a qualitative analysis.
    Owen LE; Anderson SA; Dowell JS
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Apr; 18(1):58. PubMed ID: 29609609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainties in the selection of applicants for medical school.
    Benbassat J; Baumal R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 Nov; 12(4):509-21. PubMed ID: 17703368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of Multiple Mini-Interviews and traditional interviews within and between institutions: a study of five California medical schools.
    Jerant A; Henderson MC; Griffin E; Rainwater JA; Hall TR; Kelly CJ; Peterson EM; Wofsy D; Franks P
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):190. PubMed ID: 29110662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors of professional behaviour and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: A longitudinal cohort study.
    Adam J; Bore M; Childs R; Dunn J; Mckendree J; Munro D; Powis D
    Med Teach; 2015; 37(9):868-80. PubMed ID: 25665628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Academic and noncognitive factors affecting placement of medical school applicants on an alternate list.
    Georgesen JC; Wilson JF; Elam CL; Stahlman KS
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10 Suppl):S65-7. PubMed ID: 10536596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. James Cook University's rurally orientated medical school selection process: quality graduates and positive workforce outcomes.
    Ray RA; Woolley T; Sen Gupta T
    Rural Remote Health; 2015; 15(4):3424. PubMed ID: 26442581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increasing the relative weight of noncognitive admission criteria improves underrepresented minority admission rates to medical school.
    Ballejos MP; Rhyne RL; Parkes J
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 25893937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Content Analysis of Interviewee Reports of Medical School Admissions Interviews.
    Rippentrop AE; Yung-Sang Wong M; Altmaier EM
    Med Educ Online; 2003 Dec; 8(1):4333. PubMed ID: 28253167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.