170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23029949)
1. Prevention of voice prosthesis biofilms: current scenario and future trends in prolonging prosthesis lifetime.
Sayed SI; Datta S; Deore N; Kazi RA; Jagade MV
J Indian Med Assoc; 2012 Mar; 110(3):175-8, 180. PubMed ID: 23029949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The artificial throat: a new method for standardization of in vitro experiments with tracheo-oesophageal voice prostheses.
Leunisse C; van Weissenbruch R; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Albers FW
Acta Otolaryngol; 1999; 119(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 10478604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies for the prevention of microbial biofilm formation on silicone rubber voice prostheses.
Rodrigues L; Banat IM; Teixeira J; Oliveira R
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2007 May; 81(2):358-70. PubMed ID: 17022068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Difficulties in the fixation of prostheses for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy.
Ten Hallers EJ; Marres HA; Rakhorst G; Hagen R; Staffieri A; Van Der Laan BF; Van Der Houwen EB; Verkerke GJ
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 125(8):804-13. PubMed ID: 16158525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lactobacilli: important in biofilm formation on voice prostheses.
Buijssen KJ; Harmsen HJ; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; van der Laan BF
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Sep; 137(3):505-7. PubMed ID: 17765785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of complications after surgical voice and speech rehabilitation in laryngectomized patients. Problems related to implantation and change of voice prosthesis].
Bień S; Okła S
Otolaryngol Pol; 2006; 60(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 16903325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy, primary insertion of a speech ventilator].
Balle VH; Thomsen JC
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Apr; 155(14):1053-5. PubMed ID: 8497936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Degradation of silicone rubber causes Provox 2 voice prosthesis malfunctioning.
Fusconi M; Taddei AR; Gallo A; Conte M; De Virgilio A; Greco A; Lo Vasco VR; Macrì GF; Roma R; Volpini F; Benincasa AT; De Vincentiis M
J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 24315657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Voice prostheses with sound-producing metal reed element--an experimental study and initial clinical results].
Hagen R; Berning K; Korn M; Schön F
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jun; 77(6):312-21. PubMed ID: 9701754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the microbial composition of voice prosthesis biofilms from patients requiring frequent versus infrequent replacement.
Elving GJ; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; van Weissenbruch R; Albers FW
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2002 Mar; 111(3 Pt 1):200-3. PubMed ID: 11915880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Examination of biofilm related material deterioration on 20 PROVOX2 voice prostheses by scanning electron microscopy].
Leonhard M; Reumüller A; Moser D; Bigenzahn W; Schneider-Stickler B
Laryngorhinootologie; 2009 Jun; 88(6):392-7. PubMed ID: 19221979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of voice prosthesis leakage with Blom-Singer large esophage and tracheal flange voice prostheses.
Choussy O; Hibon R; Bon Mardion N; Dehesdin D
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2013 Apr; 130(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 23228654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Practical aspects of voice prosthesis use after laryngectomy].
Delank KW; Scheuermann K
Laryngorhinootologie; 2008 Mar; 87(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 18098100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Early and late complications after implantation of the Provox 2 voice prosthesis in patients after total laryngectomy].
Wierzchowska M; Burduk PK
Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 21916217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The ultra-low resistance Groningen voice prosthesis: aerodynamic properties.
Chung RP; Geskus J; Mahieu HF
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1999; 120(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10668359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of biofilm formation on new Phonax and Provox 2 voice prostheses - a pilot study.
Leonhard M; Moser D; Reumueller A; Mancusi G; Bigenzahn W; Schneider-Stickler B
Head Neck; 2010 Jul; 32(7):886-95. PubMed ID: 19862824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biofilm formation and design features of indwelling silicone rubber tracheoesophageal voice prostheses--an electron microscopical study.
Leunisse C; van Weissenbruch R; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Dijk F; Albers FW
J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 11505431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of surface roughness on silicone rubber voice prostheses on in vitro biofilm formation and clinical lifetime in laryngectomised patients.
Buijssen KJDA; Oosterhof JJH; Basil L; Waters M; Duits MA; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; van der Laan BFAM
Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 42(6):1235-1240. PubMed ID: 28236355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Nijdam voice prosthesis: a self-retaining valveless voice prosthesis for vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
van den Hoogen FJ; Nijdam HF; Veenstra A; Manni JJ
Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Nov; 116(6):913-7. PubMed ID: 8973732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy using the Newvox voice prosthesis.
Traissac L; Chene G; Devars F; Houliat T; Essalki I; Bekhar H; Rousseau A
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2007; 128(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 18323328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
