170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23029949)
21. [Biodegradation of silicone in voice prosthesis].
Slavícek A; Betka J; Novák V; Kinkal J; Wasserbauer R; Vymazalová Z; Last'ovicková B
Sb Lek; 2000; 101(4):325-39. PubMed ID: 11702571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Candida biofilm formation on voice prostheses.
Talpaert MJ; Balfour A; Stevens S; Baker M; Muhlschlegel FA; Gourlay CW
J Med Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 64(Pt 3):199-208. PubMed ID: 25106862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Voice rehabilitation following total laryngectomy: microvascular laryngeal replacement-plasty (laryngoplasty) instead of voice prosthesis].
Hagen R
Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Apr; 69(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 2354015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
Hilgers FJ; Schouwenburg PF
Laryngoscope; 1990 Nov; 100(11):1202-7. PubMed ID: 2233085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Candida biofilm formation on Provox 2 and Provox Acti Valve voice prosthesis].
Nowak M; Kurnatowski P
Otolaryngol Pol; 2010; 64(6):358-64. PubMed ID: 21302502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biofilm in voice prosthesis: A prospective cohort study and laboratory tests using sonication and SEM analysis.
Galli J; Calo L; Meucci D; Giuliani M; Lucidi D; Paludetti G; Torelli R; Sanguinetti M; Parrilla C
Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 43(5):1260-1265. PubMed ID: 29768730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A new method for in vivo evaluation of biofilms on surface-modified silicone rubber voice prostheses.
Everaert EP; Mahieu HF; Wong Chung RP; Verkerke GJ; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 254(6):261-3. PubMed ID: 9248731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Anaerobic and microaerophilic pathogens in the biofilm formation on voice prostheses: A pilot study.
Bertl K; Zatorska B; Leonhard M; Matejka M; Schneider-Stickler B
Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1035-9. PubMed ID: 22374743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Voice rehabilitation with Provox2 voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Terada T; Saeki N; Toh K; Uwa N; Sagawa K; Takayasu S; Sakagami M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Mar; 34(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17137738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy in West Germany. Current state of the art].
Hagen R
HNO; 1990 Nov; 38(11):417-20. PubMed ID: 2289900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy by the Gronigen prosthesis].
Manni JJ; van den Broek P; de Groot MA
HNO; 1985 May; 33(5):216-9. PubMed ID: 4008280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Voice prostheses, microbial colonization and biofilm formation.
Leonhard M; Schneider-Stickler B
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2015; 830():123-36. PubMed ID: 25366225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech rehabilitation using a voice prostheses following laryngectomy.
Kramp B; Boehm F; Fischer AL
Otolaryngol Pol; 2000; 54(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 11265379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Current status and future prospects in prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy.
Pawar PV; Sayed SI; Kazi R; Jagade MV
J Cancer Res Ther; 2008; 4(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 19052392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of dairy products on the lifetime of Provox2 voice prostheses in vitro and in vivo.
Schwandt LQ; van Weissenbruch R; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; Albers FW
Head Neck; 2005 Jun; 27(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 15825199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.
Singer MI; Blom ED; Hamaker RC
J Otolaryngol; 1983 Oct; 12(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 6644863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Time course of microbial colonization of different voice prostheses].
Schuldt T; Dommerich S; Pau HW; Kramp B
Laryngorhinootologie; 2010 Oct; 89(10):606-11. PubMed ID: 20949410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differences in aerodynamic characteristics of new and dysfunctional Provox 2 voice prostheses in vivo.
Schwandt LQ; Tjong-Ayong HJ; van Weissenbruch R; der Mei HC; Albers FW
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 263(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 16421748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro leakage susceptibility of tracheoesophageal shunt prostheses in the absence and presence of a biofilm.
Oosterhof JJ; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ; Free RH; Kaper HJ; van Weissenbruch R; Albers FW
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Apr; 73(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15660395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Groningen prosthesis.
Manni JJ; van den Broek P; de Groot MA; Berends E
J Otolaryngol; 1984 Oct; 13(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 6544851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
