These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23030642)

  • 21. Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words.
    Cortese MJ; Khanna MM; Hacker S
    Memory; 2010 Aug; 18(6):595-609. PubMed ID: 20677075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Imageability and body-object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns.
    Bennett SD; Burnett AN; Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1100-9. PubMed ID: 21681627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of word class proportion on cerebral asymmetries for high- and low-imagery words.
    Chiarello C; Shears C; Liu S; Kacinik NA
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15629212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Since when or how often? Dissociating the roles of age of acquisition (AoA) and lexical frequency in early visual word processing.
    Adorni R; Manfredi M; Proverbio AM
    Brain Lang; 2013 Jan; 124(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 23314421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.
    Arciuli J; Cupples L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):920-48. PubMed ID: 16608755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A fresh look at the predictors of naming accuracy and errors in Alzheimer's disease.
    Cuetos F; Rodríguez-Ferreiro J; Sage K; Ellis AW
    J Neuropsychol; 2012 Sep; 6(2):242-56. PubMed ID: 22284909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age of acquisition estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words.
    Schock J; Cortese MJ; Khanna MM; Toppi S
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):971-7. PubMed ID: 22581492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision.
    Morrison CM; Ellis AW
    Br J Psychol; 2000 May; 91 ( Pt 2)():167-80. PubMed ID: 10832512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference.
    Catling JC; Dent K; Johnston RA; Balding R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1304-17. PubMed ID: 20127547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?
    Perea M; Gil-López C; Beléndez V; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1631-47. PubMed ID: 26340587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.
    Cortese MJ; Yates M; Schock J; Vilks L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2295-2313. PubMed ID: 30362414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
    Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition: evidence from the effects of visual degradation.
    Catling JC; Dent K; Williamson S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 18599003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of encoding difficulty, word frequency, and phonological regularity on age differences in word naming.
    Allen PA; Bucur B; Grabbe J; Work T; Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 2011 May; 37(3):261-92. PubMed ID: 21534029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.
    Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Aguilera L; Owen WJ; Sears CR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):433-43. PubMed ID: 17258186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Word imageability affects the hippocampus in recognition memory.
    Klaver P; Fell J; Dietl T; Schür S; Schaller C; Elger CE; Fernández G
    Hippocampus; 2005; 15(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 15986408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
    Wile TL; Borowsky R
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):47-62. PubMed ID: 15172524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis.
    Belke E; Brysbaert M; Meyer AS; Ghyselinck M
    Cognition; 2005 Jun; 96(2):B45-54. PubMed ID: 15925568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Phonological decoding or direct access? Regularity effects in lexical decisions of Grade 3 and 4 children.
    Schmalz X; Marinus E; Castles A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):338-46. PubMed ID: 22905801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. For richer or poorer? Imageability effects in semantic dementia patients' reading aloud.
    Woollams AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Sep; 76():254-63. PubMed ID: 25804665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.