230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23030693)
1. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
Lété B; Bonin P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.
Cortese MJ; Schock J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):946-72. PubMed ID: 23030642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers.
Perea M; Soares AP; Comesaña M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Sep; 116(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23374607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency trajectory effects in Chinese character recognition: evidence for the arbitrary mapping hypothesis.
You W; Chen B; Dunlap S
Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 19091311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
Alija M; Cuetos F
Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled.
Pérez MA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jan; 60(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 17162506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition: evidence from the effects of visual degradation.
Catling JC; Dent K; Williamson S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 18599003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
Mathey S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between reading ability and lateralized lexical decision.
Weems SA; Zaidel E
Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):507-15. PubMed ID: 15223197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semantic transparency in free stems: The effect of Orthography-Semantics Consistency on word recognition.
Marelli M; Amenta S; Crepaldi D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1571-83. PubMed ID: 25269473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The time-course of lexical activation in Japanese morphographic word recognition: evidence for a character-driven processing model.
Miwa K; Libben G; Dijkstra T; Baayen H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):79-113. PubMed ID: 23713954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: an analysis of 2,342 words.
Cortese MJ; Khanna MM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Aug; 60(8):1072-82. PubMed ID: 17654392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do handwritten words magnify lexical effects in visual word recognition?
Perea M; Gil-López C; Beléndez V; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(8):1631-47. PubMed ID: 26340587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
