230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23030693)
21. Revisiting age-of-acquisition effects in Spanish visual word recognition: the role of item imageability.
Wilson MA; Cuetos F; Davies R; Burani C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1842-59. PubMed ID: 23751009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Homophone interference effects in visual word recognition.
Ferrand L; Grainger J
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 12745841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Markedness effects in Norwegian-English bilinguals: task-dependent use of language-specific letters and bigrams.
van Kesteren R; Dijkstra T; de Smedt K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2129-54. PubMed ID: 22554207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: evidence for nonselective lexical access.
Duyck W; Assche EV; Drieghe D; Hartsuiker RJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):663-79. PubMed ID: 17576146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spelling-to-sound correspondences affect acronym recognition processes.
Playfoot D; Izura C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):1026-39. PubMed ID: 25337636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.
Adelman JS; Brown GD; Quesada JF
Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):814-23. PubMed ID: 16984300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reading in Spanish and Italian: effects of age of acquisition in transparent orthographies?
Davies R; Wilson M; Cuetos F; Burani C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1808-25. PubMed ID: 24456370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of encoding difficulty, word frequency, and phonological regularity on age differences in word naming.
Allen PA; Bucur B; Grabbe J; Work T; Madden DJ
Exp Aging Res; 2011 May; 37(3):261-92. PubMed ID: 21534029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sequential effects of phonological priming in visual word recognition.
Carreiras M; Ferrand L; Grainger J; Perea M
Psychol Sci; 2005 Aug; 16(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 16102059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Serial and parallel processing in reading: investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition.
Dare N; Shillcock R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):487-504. PubMed ID: 22950804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Phonological decoding or direct access? Regularity effects in lexical decisions of Grade 3 and 4 children.
Schmalz X; Marinus E; Castles A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):338-46. PubMed ID: 22905801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is pupillary response a reliable index of word recognition? Evidence from a delayed lexical decision task.
Haro J; Guasch M; Vallès B; Ferré P
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1930-1938. PubMed ID: 27924440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.
Muncer SJ; Knight DC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2221-30. PubMed ID: 22804754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect.
Qiao X; Forster KI
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1064-74. PubMed ID: 23088548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Since when or how often? Dissociating the roles of age of acquisition (AoA) and lexical frequency in early visual word processing.
Adorni R; Manfredi M; Proverbio AM
Brain Lang; 2013 Jan; 124(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 23314421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The processing advantage and disadvantage for homophones in lexical decision tasks.
Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Lupker SJ; Jared D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):529-51. PubMed ID: 22905930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Age-of-acquisition differences in young and older adults affect latencies in lexical decision and semantic categorization.
De Deyne S; Storms G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 16777041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of low-spatial frequencies in lexical decision and masked priming.
Boden C; Giaschi D
Brain Cogn; 2009 Apr; 69(3):580-91. PubMed ID: 19168272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Sensory experience ratings (SERs) for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and visual word recognition.
Bonin P; Méot A; Ferrand L; Bugaïska A
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):813-25. PubMed ID: 24993636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
