These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23030820)
1. Assessing nonchoosers' eyewitness identification accuracy from photographic showups by using confidence and response times. Sauerland M; Sagana A; Sporer SL Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):394-403. PubMed ID: 23030820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study. Sauerland M; Sporer SL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup. Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison. Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration. Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study. Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decision time and confidence predict choosers' identification performance in photographic showups. Sauerland M; Sagana A; Sporer SL; Wixted JT PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190416. PubMed ID: 29346394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy. Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Brewer N; Wells GL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images. Thompson WB; Johnson J J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Semmler C; Brewer N; Wells GL J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):334-46. PubMed ID: 15065979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions. Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory. Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: an archival analysis. Behrman BW; Davey SL Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 11688369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postdictors of eyewitness errors: can false identifications be diagnosed? Smith SM; Lindsay RC; Pryke S J Appl Psychol; 2000 Aug; 85(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 10948799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Context influences interpretation of eyewitness confidence statements. Cash DK; Lane SM Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):180-190. PubMed ID: 27598562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of retention interval on the confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification. Sauer J; Brewer N; Zweck T; Weber N Law Hum Behav; 2010 Aug; 34(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 19626432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The dud effect: adding highly dissimilar fillers increases confidence in lineup identifications. Charman SD; Wells GL; Joy SW Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):479-500. PubMed ID: 21222024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]