186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23031268)
1. Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system.
Legrand I; Hocquette JF; Polkinghorne RJ; Pethick DW
Animal; 2013 Mar; 7(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 23031268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumer assessment of beef strip loin steaks of varying fat levels.
O'Quinn TG; Brooks JC; Polkinghorne RJ; Garmyn AJ; Johnson BJ; Starkey JD; Rathmann RJ; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2012 Feb; 90(2):626-34. PubMed ID: 21948609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of Japanese and Australian consumers' sensory perceptions of beef.
Polkinghorne RJ; Nishimura T; Neath KE; Watson R
Anim Sci J; 2014 Jan; 85(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23773578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Production and processing studies on calpain-system gene markers for beef tenderness: consumer assessments of eating quality.
Robinson DL; Cafe LM; McIntyre BL; Geesink GH; Barendse W; Pethick DW; Thompson JM; Polkinghorne R; Greenwood PL
J Anim Sci; 2012 Aug; 90(8):2850-60. PubMed ID: 22367069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology.
Polkinghorne RJ; Nishimura T; Neath KE; Watson R
Anim Sci J; 2011 Apr; 82(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 21729214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability.
Hocquette JF; Van Wezemael L; Chriki S; Legrand I; Verbeke W; Farmer L; Scollan ND; Polkinghorne R; Rødbotten R; Allen P; Pethick DW
Meat Sci; 2014 Jul; 97(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 24035246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Review: The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction.
Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2434-2442. PubMed ID: 29606159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meat standards and grading: a world view.
Polkinghorne RJ; Thompson JM
Meat Sci; 2010 Sep; 86(1):227-35. PubMed ID: 20541325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride to beef and calf-fed Holstein cattle on consumer palatability ratings.
Mehaffey JM; Brooks JC; Rathmann RJ; Alsup EM; Hutcheson JP; Nichols WT; Streeter MN; Yates DA; Johnson BJ; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2009 Nov; 87(11):3712-21. PubMed ID: 19717772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does a single adjustment in the meat standards Australia beef grading model cater for different hormonal growth promotant formulations?
Packer DT; McGilchrist P; Polkinghorne RJ; Ball AJ; Thompson JM
Animal; 2021 May; 15(5):100196. PubMed ID: 34029795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee Insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries.
Verbeke W; Van Wezemael L; de Barcellos MD; Kügler JO; Hocquette JF; Ueland Ø; Grunert KG
Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 19961887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biochemical measurements of beef are a good predictor of untrained consumer sensory scores across muscles.
Bonny SP; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
Animal; 2015 Jan; 9(1):179-90. PubMed ID: 25245561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variables affecting the propensity to buy branded beef among groups of Australian beef buyers.
Morales LE; Griffith G; Wright V; Fleming E; Umberger W; Hoang N
Meat Sci; 2013 Jun; 94(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 23501257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.
McCarthy SN; Henchion M; White A; Brandon K; Allen P
Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():118-124. PubMed ID: 28522169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic, Canadian, and Australian grass-fed beef steaks.
Sitz BM; Calkins CR; Feuz DM; Umberger WJ; Eskridge KM
J Anim Sci; 2005 Dec; 83(12):2863-8. PubMed ID: 16282625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of estrogen-trenbolone acetate implants on tenderness and consumer acceptability of beef under the effect of 2 aging times.
Igo JL; Brooks JC; Johnson BJ; Starkey J; Rathmann RJ; Garmyn AJ; Nichols WT; Hutcheson JP; Miller MF
J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 21346138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
