These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Use of the concordance correlation coefficient when examining agreement in dyadic research. Quinn C; Haber MJ; Pan Y Nurs Res; 2009; 58(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 19752677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Simple Approach for Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Two Concordance Correlation Coefficients Estimated on the Same Subjects. Lin HM; Williamson JM J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(6):1145-60. PubMed ID: 25321842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Upper airway dimensions in children using rigid video-bronchoscopy and a computer software: description of a measurement technique. Dalal PG; Murray D; Feng A; Molter D; McAllister J Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Jul; 18(7):645-53. PubMed ID: 18482248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of equivalence using a concordance correlation coefficient in a repeated measurements design. Quiroz J J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):913-28. PubMed ID: 16279351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Two confidence interval approaches on the dependability coefficient in a two-factor crossed design. Ting N; Cappelleri JC; Bushmakin AG J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 20183429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Coefficients of agreement for fixed observers. Haber M; Barnhart HX Stat Methods Med Res; 2006 Jun; 15(3):255-71. PubMed ID: 16768299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A new permutation-based method for assessing agreement between two observers making replicated quantitative readings. Pan Y; Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(20):2249-61. PubMed ID: 22415910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Generalized confidence interval for an agreement between raters. Bhaumik DK; Shi H; Reda DJ; Sinha BK Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2230-2238. PubMed ID: 33576023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Bayesian estimate of the concordance correlation coefficient with skewed data. Feng D; Baumgartner R; Svetnik V Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(4):350-8. PubMed ID: 26033433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings. Barnhart HX; Song J; Haber MJ Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1371-84. PubMed ID: 15570569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Distinguishability and agreement with continuous data. Carrasco JL; Caceres A; Escaramis G; Jover L Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 23825013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An extension of Satterthwaite's approximation applied to pharmacokinetics. Nedelman JR; Jia X J Biopharm Stat; 1998 May; 8(2):317-28. PubMed ID: 9598425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability studies of diagnostic tests are not using enough observers for robust estimation of interobserver agreement: a simulation study. Sadatsafavi M; Najafzadeh M; Lynd L; Marra C J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 61(7):722-7. PubMed ID: 18486446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. SAS macro programs for geographically weighted generalized linear modeling with spatial point data: applications to health research. Chen VY; Yang TC Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):262-73. PubMed ID: 22078167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of disagreement: a new information-based approach. Costa-Santos C; Antunes L; Souto A; Bernardes J Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):555-61. PubMed ID: 20538199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]