232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23031787)
1. Mammography-based screening program: preliminary results from a first 2-year round in a Brazilian region using mobile and fixed units.
Haikel RL; Mauad EC; Silva TB; Mattos JS; Chala LF; Longatto-Filho A; de Barros N
BMC Womens Health; 2012 Oct; 12():32. PubMed ID: 23031787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Equity in access to breast cancer screening in a mobile mammography program in southern Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil].
Renck DV; Barros F; Domingues MR; Gonzalez MC; Sclowitz ML; Caputo EL; Gomes Lde M
Cad Saude Publica; 2014 Jan; 30(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 24627016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
Nowicki A; Stogowska I
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Screening mammography in Polish female population aged 45 to 54].
Bińkowska M; Debski R
Ginekol Pol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):871-8. PubMed ID: 16566361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptability of mobile mammography among community-dwelling older women.
Levin JR; Hirsch SH; Bastani R; Ganz PA; Lovett ML; Reuben DB
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Nov; 45(11):1365-70. PubMed ID: 9361664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program.
Stanley E; Lewis MC; Irshad A; Ackerman S; Collins H; Pavic D; Leddy RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429. PubMed ID: 28871806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved breast cancer survival following introduction of an organized mammography screening program among both screened and unscreened women: a population-based cohort study.
Kalager M; Haldorsen T; Bretthauer M; Hoff G; Thoresen SO; Adami HO
Breast Cancer Res; 2009; 11(4):R44. PubMed ID: 19575807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammograms on-the-go-predictors of repeat visits to mobile mammography vans in St Louis, Missouri, USA: a case-control study.
Drake BF; Abadin SS; Lyons S; Chang SH; Steward LT; Kraenzle S; Goodman MS
BMJ Open; 2015 Mar; 5(3):e006960. PubMed ID: 25795693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of breast cancer cases according to county-level poverty status in 3.5 million rural women who participated in a breast cancer screening program of Hunan province, China from 2016 to 2018.
Lili X; Zhiyu L; Yinglan W; Aihua W; Hongyun L; Ting L; Yingxia W; Guanghui Y; Xianghua C; Junqun F; Donghua X; Fanjuan K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Apr; 99(17):e19954. PubMed ID: 32332679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.
Vang S; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
Prev Chronic Dis; 2018 Nov; 15():E140. PubMed ID: 30447104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduction of Advanced Breast Cancer Stages at Subsequent Participation in Mammography Screening.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Heidrich J; Heidinger O; Hense HW
Rofo; 2016 Jan; 188(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 26485700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mobile mammography screening: the James Graham Brown Cancer Center three year experience. Implications for public and professional education.
Flynn MB; Amin EA; Martin RC
J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Jan; 96(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 9470312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contradictions in women's health care provision: a case study of attendance for breast cancer screening.
Ross NA; Rosenberg MW; Pross DC; Bass B
Soc Sci Med; 1994 Oct; 39(8):1015-25. PubMed ID: 7809655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overdiagnosis in the population-based organized breast cancer screening program estimated by a non-homogeneous multi-state model: a cohort study using individual data with long-term follow-up.
Wu WY; Törnberg S; Elfström KM; Liu X; Nyström L; Jonsson H
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):153. PubMed ID: 30558679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance.
Mauad EC; Nicolau SM; Moreira LF; Haikel RL; Longatto-Filho A; Baracat EC
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1241. PubMed ID: 19778158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program differ from those visiting a stationary mammography facility?
Vyas A; Madhavan S; Kelly K; Metzger A; Schreiman J; Remick S
J Community Health; 2013 Aug; 38(4):698-706. PubMed ID: 23504266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
