190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23032203)
1. Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of three stable internal fixation techniques used in sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a study in sheep mandibles.
Olivera LB; Sant' Ana E; Manzato AJ; Guerra FL; Arnett GW
J Appl Oral Sci; 2012; 20(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 23032203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro study of a modified sagittal split osteotomy fixation technique of the mandible: a mechanical test.
Sonego CL; Scheffer MAR; Chagas Júnior OL; Vetromilla BM; Fernandes LP; Ozkomur A; Silva Júnior AN; Miguens Júnior SAQ; Hernandez PAG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1330-1335. PubMed ID: 29655819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate.
Pereira Filho VA; Iamashita HY; Monnazzi MS; Gabrielli MF; Vaz LG; Passeri LA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 22898312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
Gursoytrak B; Unsal N; Demetoglu U; Simsek HO; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2063-2068. PubMed ID: 30446327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Altuncu F; Kazan D; Özden B
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2023 Nov; 28(6):e553-e561. PubMed ID: 37823299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; de Medeiros RC; Goulart DR; Bomfim-Azevedo VL; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2082-2087. PubMed ID: 30322777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles.
Oguz Y; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D; Uckan S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 20226575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
Oguz Y; Watanabe ER; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 44(8):984-8. PubMed ID: 25840861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement.
De Oliveira LB; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Oguz Y; Pereira-Filho VA
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 54(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 27068853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the bending strength of rigid internal fixation with absorbable and metallic screws in mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy: in vitro study.
Gomes PP; Guimarães Filho R; Mazzonetto R
Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2003; 17(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 14762506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of fixation methods used in sagittal split osteotomy with a major advancement and counterclockwise rotation.
Geçkil N; Can Tukel H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 60(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 35065834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro comparison of the mechanical characteristics of three sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Murphy MT; Haug RH; Barber JE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 May; 55(5):489-94; discussion 494-5. PubMed ID: 9146519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different hybrid rigid internal fixation techniques on the postoperative stability following a mandibular advancement using a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A retrospective three-dimensional comparative study.
Telha W; Al-Watary MQ; Sakran K; Chen H; Bi R; Zhu S; Jiang N
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Apr; 125(2):101667. PubMed ID: 38738550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of fixation methods in large mandibular advancements after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Kuik K; Ho JPTF; de Ruiter MHT; Klop C; Kleverlaan CJ; de Lange J; Hoekema A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 59(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 33468331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
