These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23032203)

  • 21. Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
    Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 20006171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques using a finite element method.
    Albougha S; Darwich K; Darwich MA; Albogha MH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 44(7):823-9. PubMed ID: 25766461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative study of biomechanical stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a novel designed in-vitro testing unit.
    Ulu M; Soylu E; Kelebek S; Dikici S; Oflaz H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 46(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 29295797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of standard miniplates and locked miniplates in post-traumatic fracture stabilization.
    Yazar L; Aydil BA; Ayhan M; Çömlekçioğlu Y
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jun; 28(6):715-722. PubMed ID: 35652876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
    Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Experimental analysis of functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies secured by miniplates and position screws.
    Shetty V; Freymiller E; McBrearty D; Caputo AA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Nov; 54(11):1317-24; discussion 1324-6. PubMed ID: 8941183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison between the rigidity of bicortical screws and a miniplate for fixation of a mandibular setback after a simulated bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Tharanon W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Sep; 56(9):1055-8. PubMed ID: 9734767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles.
    Uckan S; Schwimmer A; Kummer F; Greenberg AM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 39(4):266-8. PubMed ID: 11437421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fixation methods in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review on in vitro biomechanical assessments.
    Kuik K; De Ruiter MHT; De Lange J; Hoekema A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 30017569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy.
    Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
    Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the effect of mandibular length and height on the sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques: A finite element analysis.
    Ergezen Ozasir E; Tosun E; Tuz HH
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 121(6):652-657. PubMed ID: 32068168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Which type of method shows the best mechanical behavior for internal fixation of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in major advancements with clockwise rotation? Comparison of four methods.
    de Carvalho PHM; Oliveira SDS; Favaro M; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Mar; 25(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 32661574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the Stability of Mandibular Sagittal Osteotomy Fixation between Two Types of Titanium Miniplates: A Biomechanical Study in Sheep Mandibles.
    Trento GDS; Pires FA; Santos FAD; Costa DJD; Rebellato NLB; Klüppel LE
    Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2018 Jun; 11(2):114-117. PubMed ID: 29892325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of polymethylmethacrylate on the stability of screw fixation in mandibular angle fractures: A study on sheep mandibles.
    Cankaya AB; Kasapoglu MB; Erdem MA; Kasapoglu C
    Int J Med Sci; 2018; 15(13):1466-1471. PubMed ID: 30443166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of postoperative stability of three rigid internal fixation techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement.
    Sato FR; Asprino L; Fernandes Moreira RW; de Moraes M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e224-9. PubMed ID: 24103461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements. Part two: Finite element analysis.
    Sigua-Rodriguez EA; Caldas RA; Goulart DR; Hemerson de Moraes P; Olate S; Ricardo Barão VA; Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1015-1019. PubMed ID: 30718216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of the mandibular plane and magnitude of the movement in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro study.
    de Assis GM; Dos Santos VDB; Queiroz SIML; Germano AR
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):625-631. PubMed ID: 35001178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.