These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23032203)

  • 41. Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.
    Politi M; Costa F; Cian R; Polini F; Robiony M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Feb; 62(2):169-81. PubMed ID: 14762749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Bone Fixation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Individual Models.
    Tamura N; Takaki T; Takano N; Shibahara T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 29962423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In Vitro Mechanical Analysis of Different Techniques of Internal Fixation of Combined Mandibular Angle and Body Fractures.
    de Medeiros RC; Sigua EA; Navarro P; Olate S; Albergaria Barbosa JR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):778-85. PubMed ID: 26701138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Biomechanical evaluation of locking versus nonlocking 2.0-mm malleable L-miniplate fixation of simulated caudal mandibular fractures in cats.
    Kot CCS; Verstraete FJM; Garcia TC; Stover SM; Arzi B
    Am J Vet Res; 2022 Jun; 83(8):. PubMed ID: 35895785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis.
    Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; Noritomi PY; de Moraes M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Nov; 114(5 Suppl):S60-8. PubMed ID: 23083958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    da Silva Oliveira S; de Carvalho PHM; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):633-639. PubMed ID: 35022847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparative evaluation of stress distribution and transverse displacement of novel designs of miniplates for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: a finite element analysis.
    Anlar H; Hasanoglu Erbasar GN; Konarılı FN; Orhan M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 60(9):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 36055864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An in vitro study of the effect of bony buttressing on fixation strength of a fractured atrophic edentulous mandible model.
    Sikes JW; Smith BR; Mukherjee DP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 58(1):56-61; discussion 62. PubMed ID: 10632166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in sagittal split ramus osteotomies.
    Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kılınc Y; Arslan M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 26755233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Biomechanical evaluation of malleable noncompression miniplates in mandibular angle fractures: an experimental study.
    Esen A; Dolanmaz D; Tüz HH
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 50(5):e65-8. PubMed ID: 22118919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.
    Oh JS; Kim SG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of Three Different Osteosynthesis Methods for Mandibular Angle Fractures: Vertical Load Test.
    Pereira-Filho VA; Oliveira LF; Reis JM; Gabrielli MA; Neto RS; Monnazzi MS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):1770-1773. PubMed ID: 27648657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How effective is a thick plate on stabilisation in 10 mm mandibular advancement?
    Esen A; Menziletoglu D; Aybüke Erdur E; Akkulah S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jul; 60(6):803-809. PubMed ID: 35437194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of the mandibular plane angle on fracture line stability: An ex vivo experimental study.
    Ben Said M; Yildirimturk S; Sirin Y
    Dent Traumatol; 2019 Jun; 35(3):181-187. PubMed ID: 30714306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep.
    Cilasun U; Uckan S; Dolanmaz D; Saglam H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):534-7. PubMed ID: 16423434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible.
    Hakim SG; Wolf M; Wendlandt R; Kimmerle H; Sieg P; Jacobsen HC
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24629455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems used in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Vieira Santos ZTB; Goulart DR; Sigua-Rodriguez EA; Pozzer L; Olate S; Albergaria-Barbosa JR
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 43(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 28462190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The incidence of postoperative wound healing problems following sagittal ramus osteotomies stabilized with miniplates and monocortical screws.
    Alpha C; O'Ryan F; Silva A; Poor D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):659-68. PubMed ID: 16546646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparative in vitro mechanical evaluation of techniques using a 2.0 mm locking fixation system for simulated fractures of the mandibular body.
    de Medeiros RC; de Moura AL; Sawazaki R; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 25573304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of fracture healing and subimplant bone response following fixation with a locking miniplate and screw system for mandibular angle fractures in a sheep model.
    Poon CC; Verco S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 23374732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.