These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23033280)
1. Significance of the resection margin and risk factors for close or positive resection margin in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Gatek J; Vrana D; Melichar B; Vazan P; Kotocova K; Kotoc J; Dudesek B; Hnatek L; Duben J J BUON; 2012; 17(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 23033280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection? Wood WC Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy? Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of resection margin as a risk factor for local control of early stage breast cancer. Gatek J; Vrana D; Lukesova L; Pospiskova M; Vazan P; Melichar B Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2013 Sep; 157(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 24042334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment results and prognostic factors of early breast cancer treated with a breast conserving operation and radiotherapy. Kim KJ; Huh SJ; Yang JH; Park W; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Lee JH; Kang SS; Lee JE; Kang MK; Park YJ; Nam HR Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Mar; 35(3):126-33. PubMed ID: 15741302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma. Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload. Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographically detected, clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation. Solin LJ; McCormick B; Recht A; Haffty BG; Taylor ME; Kuske RR; Bornstein BA; McNeese M; Schultz DJ; Fowble BL; Barrett W; Yeh IT; Kurtz JM; Amalric R; Fourquet A Cancer J Sci Am; 1996; 2(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 9166516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy. Caughran JL; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Dekhne NS; Benitez PR; Goldstein NS Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3020-7. PubMed ID: 19636632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience. Sahoo S; Recant WM; Jaskowiak N; Tong L; Heimann R Breast J; 2005; 11(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 15982389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Chagpar AB; Martin RC; Hagendoorn LJ; Chao C; McMasters KM Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 15474434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re-excision rate after sector resection for breast cancer: A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Clement Z; McLeay W; Hoffmann C; Shin P; Chowdhry M; Eaton M Breast Dis; 2019; 38(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 30198861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Local relapse in young (< or = 40 years) women with breast cancer after mastectomy or breast conserving surgery: 15-year results]. Fodor J; Mózsa E; Zaka Z; Polgár C; Major T Magy Onkol; 2005; 49(3):203, 205-8. PubMed ID: 16249814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]