These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23033280)
21. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. Obedian E; Haffty BG Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preliminary results: double lumpectomies for multicentric breast carcinoma. Kapoor NS; Chung A; Huynh K; Giuliano AE Am Surg; 2012 Dec; 78(12):1345-8. PubMed ID: 23265123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Risk of local failure in breast cancer patients with lobular carcinoma in situ at the final surgical margins: is re-excision necessary? Sadek BT; Shenouda MN; Abi Raad RF; Niemierko A; Keruakous AR; Goldberg SI; Taghian AG Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):726-30. PubMed ID: 24064317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CIH-Tokyo experience with breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy: 6.5 year follow-up results of 1462 patients. Kasumi F; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Iijima K; Miyagi U; Tada K; Makita M; Iwase T; Oguchi M; Yamashita T; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G Breast J; 2006; 12(5 Suppl 2):S181-90. PubMed ID: 16958999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up. Di Saverio S; Catena F; Santini D; Ansaloni L; Fogacci T; Mignani S; Leone A; Gazzotti F; Gagliardi S; De Cataldis A; Taffurelli M Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jun; 109(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 17687650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Positive or close margins in breast conserving surgery: is re-excision always necessary? Gurdal SO; Karanlik H; Cabioglu N; Ozcinar B; Yavuz E; Tuzlali S; Ozmen V Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 38(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 22440741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of margin index as a method for predicting residual disease after breast-conserving surgery in a European cancer center. Bolger JC; Solon JG; Power C; Hill AD Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):207-11. PubMed ID: 21638098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins. Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incorporating margin status information in treatment decisions for women with ductal carcinoma in situ: a decision analysis. Wang SY; Kuntz K; Tuttle T; Kane R Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):393-402. PubMed ID: 20848183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is radiation indicated in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and close or positive mastectomy margins? Chan LW; Rabban J; Hwang ES; Bevan A; Alvarado M; Ewing C; Esserman L; Fowble B Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20646871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimal access breast surgery: a single breast incision for breast conservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Spillane AJ; Brennan ME Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Apr; 35(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 18757165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does the volume of ductal carcinoma in situ impact the positive margin rate in patients undergoing breast conservation for invasive breast cancer? Martin-Dunlap TM; Cyr AE; Al Mushawah F; Gao F; Margenthaler JA J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 23688789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Excessive resections in breast-conserving surgery: a retrospective multicentre study. Krekel N; Zonderhuis B; Muller S; Bril H; van Slooten HJ; de Lange de Klerk E; van den Tol P; Meijer S Breast J; 2011; 17(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 22050281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of oncoplastic reduction techniques to reconstruct partial mastectomy defects in women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Song HM; Styblo TM; Carlson GW; Losken A Breast J; 2010; 16(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 20102367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Selecting breast cancer patients with T1-T2 tumors and one to three positive axillary nodes at high postmastectomy locoregional recurrence risk for adjuvant radiotherapy. Truong PT; Olivotto IA; Kader HA; Panades M; Speers CH; Berthelet E Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1337-47. PubMed ID: 15817335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Preoperative MRI marking technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery. Yamashiro N; Tozaki M; Ogawa T; Kawano N; Suzuki T; Ozaki S; Sakamoto N; Abe S; Fukuma E Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 19205832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical treatment of phyllodes tumors of the breast: retrospective review of 172 cases. Chen WH; Cheng SP; Tzen CY; Yang TL; Jeng KS; Liu CL; Liu TP J Surg Oncol; 2005 Sep; 91(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 16118768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery. Shin HC; Han W; Moon HG; Cho N; Moon WK; Park IA; Park SJ; Noh DY Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Aug; 134(3):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22692386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ductal carcinoma in situ: size and resection volume predict margin status. Melstrom LG; Melstrom KA; Wang EC; Pilewskie M; Winchester DJ Am J Clin Oncol; 2010 Oct; 33(5):438-42. PubMed ID: 20023569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]