These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23033883)

  • 1. A comparison of chemical enhancements for the detection of latent blood.
    Seashols SJ; Cross HD; Shrader DL; Rief A
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58(1):130-3. PubMed ID: 23033883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical note: The effects of Bluestar(®) and luminol when used in conjunction with tetramethylbenzidine or phenolphthalein.
    Luedeke M; Miller E; Sprague JE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():156-9. PubMed ID: 26990564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A comparison of the Bluestar and luminol effectiveness in bloodstain detection].
    łuczak S; Woźniak M; Papuga M; Stopińiska K; Sliwka K
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 17249372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Bluestar
    Vineyard AR; Hazelrigg EJ; Ehrhardt CJ; Connon CC
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 May; 64(3):878-887. PubMed ID: 30380138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of the luminol test with blue denim.
    Middlestead C; Thornton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Sep; 55(5):1340-2. PubMed ID: 20487151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of presumptive tests reagents on human blood confirmatory tests and DNA analysis using real time polymerase chain reaction.
    de Almeida JP; Glesse N; Bonorino C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Mar; 206(1-3):58-61. PubMed ID: 20643520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chemical enhancement techniques of bloodstain patterns and DNA recovery after fire exposure.
    Tontarski KL; Hoskins KA; Watkins TG; Brun-Conti L; Michaud AL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 19018938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel approach to obtaining reliable PCR results from luminol treated bloodstains.
    Della Manna A; Montpetit S
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Jul; 45(4):886-90. PubMed ID: 10914590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fingerprint enhancement revisited and the effects of blood enhancement chemicals on subsequent profiler Plus fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis of fresh and aged bloody fingerprints.
    Frégeau CJ; Germain O; Fourney RM
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Mar; 45(2):354-80. PubMed ID: 10782955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The presumptive reagent fluorescein for detection of dilute bloodstains and subsequent STR typing of recovered DNA.
    Budowle B; Leggitt JL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Malkiewicz SF
    J Forensic Sci; 2000 Sep; 45(5):1090-2. PubMed ID: 11005186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Black and green tea - luminol false-negative bloodstains detection.
    Bancirova M
    Sci Justice; 2012 Jun; 52(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 22583502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bleach interference in forensic luminol tests on porous surfaces: more about the drying time effect.
    Castelló A; Francés F; Verdú F
    Talanta; 2009 Feb; 77(4):1555-7. PubMed ID: 19084679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemical enhancement of footwear impressions in blood on fabric - part 2: peroxidase reagents.
    Farrugia KJ; Savage KA; Bandey H; Ciuksza T; Nic Daéid N
    Sci Justice; 2011 Sep; 51(3):110-21. PubMed ID: 21889107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of luminol formulations and their effect on DNA profiling.
    Patel G; Hopwood A
    Int J Legal Med; 2013 Jul; 127(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 23263409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Household Oxidizing Cleaners on Chemiluminescence of Blood Using Bluestar
    Adams JL; Rancourt ED; Christensen AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 May; 64(3):869-872. PubMed ID: 30248185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A quantitative method for determining a representative detection limit of the forensic luminol test for latent bloodstains.
    Cassidy BM; Lu Z; Martin JP; Tazik SK; Kellogg KW; DeJong SA; Belliveau EO; Kilgore KE; Ervin SM; Meece-Rayle M; Abraham AM; Myrick ML; Morgan SL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():396-403. PubMed ID: 28837893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The forensic use of luminol chemiluminescence to detect traces of blood inside motor vehicles.
    Quickenden TI; Ennis CP; Creamer JI
    Luminescence; 2004; 19(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 15449350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of blood on clothing laundered with sodium percarbonate.
    Howard D; Chaseling J; Wright K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109885. PubMed ID: 31430678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive experimental study of industrial, domestic and environmental interferences with the forensic luminol test for blood.
    Creamer JI; Quickenden TI; Apanah MV; Kerr KA; Robertson P
    Luminescence; 2003; 18(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 12950053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Four Presumptive Tests for the Detection of Blood on Dark Materials.
    Butler J; Chaseling J; Wright K
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Nov; 64(6):1838-1843. PubMed ID: 31150124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.