These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23033943)

  • 1. Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study.
    Arabaci T; Cicek Y; Dilsiz A; Erdogan İY; Kose O; Kizildağ A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23033943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler Tip Wear on Root Surface Roughness at Different Working Parameters: An Atomic Force Microscopic and Profilometric Study.
    Vengatachalapathi H; Naik R; Rao R; Venugopal R; Nichani AS
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2017 Jan; 19(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 31473708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of parameters on root surface roughness following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler: an in vitro study.
    Folwaczny M; Merkel U; Mehl A; Hickel R
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1221-6. PubMed ID: 15515337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler tip wear on root surface roughness under influence of various working parameters: A profilometric and atomic force microscopic study.
    Parashar A; Bhavsar N
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2023; 27(6):583-589. PubMed ID: 38434510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces.
    Baek SH; Shon WJ; Bae KS; Kum KY; Lee WC; Park YS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22093039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
    Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces.
    Oliveira G; Macedo PD; Tsurumaki JN; Sampaio JE; Marcantonio R
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 25690687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The comparison of the effects of three types of piezoelectric ultrasonic tips and air polishing system on the filling materials: an in vitro study.
    Arabaci T; Ciçek Y; Ozgöz M; Canakçi V; Canakçi CF; Eltas A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2007 Nov; 5(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 17927632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 16367854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro effectiveness of a newly-designed ultrasonic scaler tip for furcation areas.
    Oda S; Ishikawa I
    J Periodontol; 1989 Nov; 60(11):634-9. PubMed ID: 2689626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy.
    Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    J Periodontol; 1998 May; 69(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 9623897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Yagi H; Matsumoto K; Ito K
    J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17760537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 25(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 9495615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the effect on root surfaces of air turbine scalers and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Lie T; Leknes KN
    J Periodontol; 1985 Sep; 56(9):522-31. PubMed ID: 3897504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P; Motterle M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.