802 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23034152)
1. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality assessment of the methods used in published opioid conversion reviews.
Saokaew S; Oderda GM
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2012 Dec; 26(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 23216173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches.
Popovich I; Windsor B; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar CM
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50403. PubMed ID: 23300526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
MacDonald SL; Canfield SE; Fesperman SF; Dahm P
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Body mass index in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormones in New Zealand men: a cross-sectional study in fertility clinics.
Macdonald AA; Stewart AW; Farquhar CM
Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3178-87. PubMed ID: 24129611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Maestre-Lopez B; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; Vélez García-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 28192600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Methodological quality of Meta-analyses regarding studies related to genetic association on papers published in Chinese journals].
Li S; Fang K; Sun AY; Sun KX; Hu YH
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 34(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 24331971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss.
Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 23557434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews)].
Coenen M; Schuetz GM; Dewey M
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 184(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 23999778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Concordance between systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in assisted reproduction: an overview.
Mascarenhas M; Kalampokas T; Sunkara SK; Kamath MS
Hum Reprod Open; 2020; 2020(4):hoaa058. PubMed ID: 33381658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality.
Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Seehra J; Pandis N
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 67(7):754-9. PubMed ID: 24709031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
